FBKWX vs. BMNSX
FBKWX (Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z) and BMNSX (Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund) are both mutual funds - FBKWX is a Total Bond Market fund managed by Fidelity, while BMNSX is a Municipal Bonds fund managed by Baird. Over the past 10 years, FBKWX returned 2.16%/yr vs 2.08%/yr for BMNSX. Their 0.49 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. FBKWX charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for BMNSX.
Performance
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBKWX achieves a -0.52% return, which is significantly lower than BMNSX's 0.54% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FBKWX having a 2.16% annualized return and BMNSX not far behind at 2.08%.
FBKWX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- 6M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -0.52%
- 1Y
- 2.04%
- 3Y*
- 4.18%
- 5Y*
- 0.05%
- 10Y*
- 2.16%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.44%
BMNSX
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- -1.15%
- 6M
- -0.18%
- YTD
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 3.93%
- 3Y*
- 3.50%
- 5Y*
- 1.14%
- 10Y*
- 2.08%
- ALL TIME*
- 2.43%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z | -0.52% | 7.60% | 2.20% | 6.56% | -13.55% | -0.27% | 9.46% | 9.88% | -0.56% | 4.39% |
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 0.54% | 4.63% | 2.26% | 5.28% | -6.40% | 1.44% | 5.02% | 6.40% | 1.05% | 5.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBKWX and BMNSX is 0.56, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.56 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 2, 2015 | 0.49 |
The correlation between FBKWX and BMNSX shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (all time) to 0.62 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBKWX vs. BMNSX — Risk / Return Rank
FBKWX
BMNSX
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBKWX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.61 | -0.46 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.15 | 2.08 | -0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.87 | 6.81 | -3.94 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBKWX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, which is greater than BMNSX's maximum drawdown of -10.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKWX and BMNSX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBKWX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.31% | -10.24% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.88% | -2.09% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.90% | -3.21% | -1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.31% | -10.24% | -8.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.31% | -10.24% | -8.07% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.39% | -1.20% | -1.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -1.64% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 0.64% | +0.51% |
Volatility
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) has a higher volatility of 0.97% compared to Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund (BMNSX) at 0.67%. This indicates that FBKWX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BMNSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBKWX | BMNSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.97% | 0.67% | +0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.95% | 1.48% | +1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 1.79% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.71% | 2.70% | +3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.77% | 3.01% | +1.76% |
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBKWX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than BMNSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBKWX vs. BMNSX - Dividend Comparison
FBKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than BMNSX's 3.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BMNSX Baird Core Intermediate Municipal Bond Fund | 3.30% | 3.22% | 3.12% | 2.74% | 1.67% | 1.34% | 1.99% | 2.15% | 2.01% | 1.71% | 1.39% | 0.59% |
FBKWX Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z | 4.11% | 4.45% | 4.22% | 3.52% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 5.32% | 3.11% | 3.30% | 3.07% | 3.71% | 3.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBKWX and BMNSX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBKWX has higher volatility (0.97%) compared to BMNSX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKWX dropped -18.31% vs BMNSX's -10.24%.
BMNSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBKWX and BMNSX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer