PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBKWX vs. BND
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBKWX vs. BND - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FBKWX having a -0.52% return and BND slightly lower at -0.54%. Over the past 10 years, FBKWX has outperformed BND with an annualized return of 2.16%, while BND has yielded a comparatively lower 1.36% annualized return.


FBKWX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.26%
6M
-0.66%
YTD
-0.52%
1Y
2.04%
3Y*
4.18%
5Y*
0.05%
10Y*
2.16%
ALL TIME*
2.44%

BND

1D
-0.26%
1M
-1.20%
6M
-0.75%
YTD
-0.54%
1Y
1.75%
3Y*
3.92%
5Y*
-0.42%
10Y*
1.36%
ALL TIME*
2.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$451.00M$507.49M$592.68M
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FBKWX vs. BND - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBKWX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z
-0.52%7.60%2.20%6.56%-13.55%-0.27%9.46%9.88%-0.56%4.39%
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
-0.54%7.08%1.38%5.65%-13.11%-1.86%7.71%8.84%-0.12%3.57%

Correlation

The correlation between FBKWX and BND is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2015

0.90

The correlation between FBKWX and BND has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBKWX vs. BND — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBKWX
FBKWX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FBKWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBKWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBKWX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FBKWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBKWX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

BND
BND Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
BND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BND Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
BND Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
BND Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
BND Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBKWX vs. BND - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBKWXBNDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.15

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.12

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.15

0.99

+0.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.87

2.48

+0.39

FBKWX vs. BND - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBKWX Sharpe Ratio is 0.86, which is comparable to the BND Sharpe Ratio of 0.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBKWX and BND, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBKWX vs. BND - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBKWX drawdown since its inception was -18.31%, roughly equal to the maximum BND drawdown of -18.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBKWX and BND.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBKWXBNDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.31%

-18.58%

+0.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.88%

-2.68%

-0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.90%

-4.81%

-0.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.31%

-17.91%

-0.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.31%

-18.58%

+0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.39%

-3.15%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.63%

-3.06%

-0.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

1.07%

+0.08%

Volatility

FBKWX vs. BND - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z (FBKWX) and Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF (BND) have volatilities of 0.97% and 0.98%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBKWXBNDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.97%

0.98%

-0.01%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.95%

2.90%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85%

3.70%

+0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.71%

6.03%

-0.32%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.77%

5.53%

-0.76%

FBKWX vs. BND - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBKWX has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BND's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBKWX vs. BND - Dividend Comparison

FBKWX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.11%, more than BND's 4.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BND
Vanguard Total Bond Market ETF
3.69%3.86%3.67%3.09%2.60%2.12%2.38%2.72%2.81%2.54%2.51%2.57%
FBKWX
Fidelity Advisor Total Bond Fund Class Z
4.11%4.45%4.22%3.52%2.59%1.97%5.32%3.11%3.30%3.07%3.71%3.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, FBKWX and BND move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BND has higher volatility (0.98%) compared to FBKWX (0.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBKWX dropped -18.31% vs BND's -18.58%.

FBKWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.86 vs 0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBKWX and BND

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer