FBIN vs. MAS
FBIN (Fortune Brands Innovations Inc.) and MAS (Masco Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Building Products & Equipment industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, FBIN returned 0.45%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for MAS. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FBIN vs. MAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBIN achieves a -12.55% return, which is significantly lower than MAS's 17.72% return. Over the past 10 years, FBIN has underperformed MAS with an annualized return of 0.45%, while MAS has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.
FBIN
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 26.66%
- YTD
- -12.55%
- 6M
- -16.24%
- 1Y
- -12.22%
- 3Y*
- -12.21%
- 5Y*
- -11.13%
- 10Y*
- 0.45%
MAS
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- 14.19%
- YTD
- 17.72%
- 6M
- 16.83%
- 1Y
- 21.87%
- 3Y*
- 11.75%
- 5Y*
- 6.70%
- 10Y*
- 10.99%
FBIN vs. MAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | -12.55% | -25.41% | -9.12% | 35.25% | -36.48% | 26.02% | 32.92% | 74.91% | -43.66% | 29.52% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 17.72% | -10.92% | 10.04% | 46.56% | -32.09% | 29.61% | 15.78% | 66.27% | -32.70% | 40.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBIN and MAS is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011 | 0.75 |
The correlation between FBIN and MAS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
FBIN:
$2.15
MAS:
$4.02
FBIN:
20.11
MAS:
18.39
FBIN:
1.17
MAS:
2.00
FBIN:
$3.36B
MAS:
$7.68B
FBIN:
$1.53B
MAS:
$2.72B
FBIN:
$484.60M
MAS:
$1.39B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBIN vs. MAS — Risk / Return Rank
FBIN
MAS
FBIN vs. MAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) and Masco Corporation (MAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBIN | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.33 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | 1.12 | -0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 0.75 | -1.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.65 | 1.54 | -2.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBIN vs. MAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBIN drawdown since its inception was -62.42%, smaller than the maximum MAS drawdown of -88.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBIN and MAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBIN | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -62.42% | -88.75% | +26.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -47.93% | -24.38% | -23.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.90% | -30.95% | -30.95% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.90% | -37.95% | -23.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -62.42% | -44.83% | -17.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.01% | -10.89% | -40.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -16.72% | -23.63% | +6.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.80% | 11.82% | +10.98% |
Volatility
FBIN vs. MAS - Volatility Comparison
Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. (FBIN) has a higher volatility of 12.40% compared to Masco Corporation (MAS) at 9.83%. This indicates that FBIN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MAS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBIN | MAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.40% | 9.83% | +2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 36.13% | 25.92% | +10.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.30% | 32.41% | +10.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 36.65% | 30.03% | +6.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.12% | 29.44% | +5.68% |
Dividends
FBIN vs. MAS - Dividend Comparison
FBIN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.36%, more than MAS's 1.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBIN Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. | 2.36% | 2.00% | 1.40% | 1.21% | 1.68% | 0.97% | 1.12% | 1.35% | 2.11% | 1.05% | 1.20% | 1.01% |
MAS Masco Corporation | 1.70% | 1.95% | 1.60% | 1.70% | 2.40% | 1.20% | 0.99% | 1.03% | 1.49% | 0.92% | 1.22% | 12.68% |
Financials
FBIN vs. MAS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. and Masco Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FBIN vs. MAS - Profitability Comparison
FBIN - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of -66.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
MAS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a gross profit of 686.00M and revenue of 1.92B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 35.8%.
FBIN - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported an operating income of -61.40M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in an operating margin of 92.8%.
MAS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported an operating income of 316.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.
FBIN - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fortune Brands Innovations Inc. reported a net income of -52.20M and revenue of -66.20M, resulting in a net margin of 78.9%.
MAS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Masco Corporation reported a net income of 213.00M and revenue of 1.92B, resulting in a net margin of 11.1%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FBIN and MAS have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBIN has higher volatility (12.40%) compared to MAS (9.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBIN dropped -62.42% vs MAS's -88.75%.
MAS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.56 vs -0.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBIN and MAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer