FBGX vs. TSMG
FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and TSMG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FBGX is passively managed, while TSMG is actively managed. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSMG.
Performance
FBGX vs. TSMG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
FBGX
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMG
- 1D
- 4.98%
- 1M
- 23.80%
- YTD
- 94.33%
- 6M
- 108.01%
- 1Y
- 327.45%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FBGX vs. TSMG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 94.33% | 76.34% |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBGX vs. TSMG — Risk / Return Rank
FBGX
TSMG
FBGX vs. TSMG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF (TSMG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBGX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 4.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | 1.79 | — |
Drawdowns
FBGX vs. TSMG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBGX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -63.67% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.29% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | 0.00% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -17.02% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.79% | — |
Volatility
FBGX vs. TSMG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBGX | TSMG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 22.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 54.92% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 71.57% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 81.08% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 81.08% | — |
FBGX vs. TSMG - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMG's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBGX vs. TSMG - Dividend Comparison
FBGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TSMG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.91%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSM Daily ETF | 5.91% | 11.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
On fees, TSMG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSMG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.
TSMG has the higher dividend yield at 5.91%, compared with 0.00% for FBGX.
They also come from different issuers: UBS and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.75% for TSMG.
Find the right allocation for FBGX and TSMG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer