FBGX vs. NTSD

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

FBGX (UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN) and NTSD (WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. FBGX is passively managed, while NTSD is actively managed. FBGX charges 1.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for NTSD.

Performance

FBGX vs. NTSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FBGX

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NTSD

• 1D: 0.35%
• 1M: 6.98%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGX vs. NTSD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FBGX UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN	0.00%
NTSD WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund	19.23%

Return for Risk

FBGX vs. NTSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS AG FI Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETN (FBGX) and WisdomTree Efficient U.S. Plus International Equity Fund (NTSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBGX	NTSD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	5.75	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGX	NTSD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-5.20%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	0.00%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-0.84%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBGX	NTSD	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	24.31%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	24.31%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	24.31%	—

FBGX vs. NTSD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGX has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than NTSD's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGX vs. NTSD - Dividend Comparison

Neither FBGX nor NTSD has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FBGX or NTSD?

On fees, NTSD is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBGX or NTSD?

NTSD is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for FBGX.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBGX or NTSD?

FBGX and NTSD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FBGX and NTSD?

They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 1.29% for FBGX and 0.35% for NTSD.