PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBGRX vs. FYHTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBGRX achieves a 10.15% return, which is significantly lower than FYHTX's 16.43% return.


FBGRX

1D
3.14%
1M
-4.18%
6M
10.25%
YTD
10.15%
1Y
24.18%
3Y*
25.20%
5Y*
13.50%
10Y*
20.56%
ALL TIME*
13.47%

FYHTX

1D
-0.24%
1M
5.38%
6M
7.21%
YTD
16.43%
1Y
28.32%
3Y*
9.46%
5Y*
8.69%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
6.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
10.15%19.91%39.77%55.61%-38.45%22.64%62.20%33.43%1.02%12.93%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
16.43%14.72%4.73%-8.62%15.32%26.43%-3.84%6.91%-11.71%6.00%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and FYHTX is 0.02, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.02

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2017

0.20

The correlation between FBGRX and FYHTX shifts across timeframes, from 0.02 (1 year) to 0.20 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBGRX vs. FYHTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBGRX
FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 4545
Martin Ratio Rank

FYHTX
FYHTX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FYHTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FYHTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FYHTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FYHTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FYHTX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FBGRXFYHTXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.34

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.73

2.18

-0.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.19

7.07

-0.88

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the FYHTX Sharpe Ratio of 1.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGRX and FYHTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, which is greater than FYHTX's maximum drawdown of -33.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and FYHTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBGRXFYHTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.64%

-33.22%

-25.42%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.65%

-12.55%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.07%

-12.55%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.08%

-25.47%

-17.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.08%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.79%

-6.78%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.49%

-11.87%

-0.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

3.95%

-0.41%

Volatility

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 6.56% compared to Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund (FYHTX) at 4.00%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYHTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBGRXFYHTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.56%

4.00%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

11.80%

+4.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.05%

14.41%

+5.64%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.24%

15.80%

+9.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.83%

14.47%

+9.36%

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FYHTX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBGRX vs. FYHTX - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than FYHTX's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBGRX
Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund
1.72%1.90%5.95%0.93%0.57%8.73%6.40%3.70%6.32%4.23%4.05%5.30%
FYHTX
Fidelity Commodity Strategy Fund
2.52%2.93%3.78%4.10%57.34%15.05%0.00%7.00%12.49%0.36%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBGRX and FYHTX have a correlation of 0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBGRX has higher volatility (6.56%) compared to FYHTX (4.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs FYHTX's -33.22%.

FYHTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.92 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBGRX and FYHTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer