FBGRX vs. FCSSX

Last updated Jul 17, 2026

FBGRX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund) and FCSSX (Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund) are both mutual funds - FBGRX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while FCSSX is a Commodities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX returned 21.53%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for FCSSX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBGRX charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FCSSX.

Performance

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FBGRX having a 16.03% return and FCSSX slightly higher at 16.73%. Over the past 10 years, FBGRX has outperformed FCSSX with an annualized return of 21.53%, while FCSSX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.22% annualized return.

FBGRX

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: -1.88%
• 6M: 15.31%
• YTD: 16.03%
• 1Y: 31.03%
• 3Y*: 28.15%
• 5Y*: 15.32%
• 10Y*: 21.53%

FCSSX

• 1D: 0.52%
• 1M: 1.63%
• 6M: 12.36%
• YTD: 16.73%
• 1Y: 25.02%
• 3Y*: 11.14%
• 5Y*: 10.21%
• 10Y*: 6.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	16.03%	19.91%	39.77%	55.61%	-38.45%	22.64%	62.20%	33.43%	1.02%	36.01%
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund	16.73%	15.43%	5.36%	-8.25%	18.11%	27.59%	-3.11%	7.41%	-12.10%	0.92%

Correlation

The correlation between FBGRX and FCSSX is -0.00, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.09
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.15
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.20
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2009	0.25

Over the past year, the correlation between FBGRX and FCSSX has dropped to -0.00 - well below their long-term average of 0.25, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FBGRX vs. FCSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBGRX

FBGRX Risk / Return Rank: 56
FBGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FBGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
FBGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 47
FBGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FBGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FCSSX

FCSSX Risk / Return Rank: 53
FCSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
FCSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FCSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 59
FCSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 45
FCSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) and Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBGRX	FCSSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	1.80	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.21	2.38	-0.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.32	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.50	2.07	+0.43
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.84	6.81	+3.03

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBGRX Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the FCSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBGRX and FCSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBGRX drawdown since its inception was -58.64%, smaller than the maximum FCSSX drawdown of -66.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBGRX and FCSSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBGRX	FCSSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.64%	-66.04%	+7.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.65%	-12.43%	-0.22%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.07%	-12.43%	-14.64%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.08%	-24.07%	-19.01%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.08%	-33.37%	-9.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.87%	-12.66%	+9.79%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.50%	-36.04%	+23.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	3.77%	-0.57%

Volatility

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund (FBGRX) has a higher volatility of 7.59% compared to Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund (FCSSX) at 4.05%. This indicates that FBGRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBGRX	FCSSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.59%	4.05%	+3.54%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.47%	11.75%	+3.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.35%	14.30%	+5.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.18%	15.95%	+9.23%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.78%	14.29%	+9.49%

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBGRX has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than FCSSX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBGRX vs. FCSSX - Dividend Comparison

FBGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, less than FCSSX's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FBGRX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth Fund	1.64%	1.90%	5.95%	0.93%	0.57%	8.73%	6.40%	3.70%	6.32%	4.23%	4.05%	5.30%
FCSSX Fidelity Series Commodity Strategy Fund	2.31%	2.69%	12.74%	4.53%	128.24%	41.74%	0.44%	1.49%	6.76%	0.53%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBGRX and FCSSX in my portfolio?

FBGRX and FCSSX have a correlation of -0.00, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBGRX or FCSSX?

FBGRX has higher volatility (7.59%) compared to FCSSX (4.05%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBGRX dropped -58.64% vs FCSSX's -66.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.