PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBDC vs. KNG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBDC vs. KNG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBDC achieves a -7.17% return, which is significantly lower than KNG's 3.13% return.


FBDC

1D
2.59%
1M
-5.28%
YTD
-7.17%
6M
-8.43%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNG

1D
0.91%
1M
0.83%
YTD
3.13%
6M
3.55%
1Y
8.66%
3Y*
7.53%
5Y*
4.50%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBDC vs. KNG - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBDC and KNG is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.33

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBDC vs. KNG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBDC

KNG
KNG Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
KNG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNG Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
KNG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNG Martin Ratio Rank: 2222
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBDC vs. KNG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC) and FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF (KNG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FBDC vs. KNG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBDCKNGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.56

0.50

-1.05

Drawdowns

FBDC vs. KNG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBDC drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum KNG drawdown of -35.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBDC and KNG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBDCKNGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.60%

-35.12%

+14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.24%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-15.10%

-5.03%

-10.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.16%

-4.13%

-6.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.33%

Volatility

FBDC vs. KNG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBDCKNGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.22%

10.22%

+8.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

13.60%

+4.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.22%

17.18%

+1.04%

FBDC vs. KNG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBDC has a 1.35% expense ratio, which is higher than KNG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBDC vs. KNG - Dividend Comparison

FBDC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.23%, more than KNG's 8.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FBDC
FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF
11.23%5.41%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNG
FT Cboe Vest S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats Target Income ETF
8.59%8.61%9.08%5.91%4.00%3.45%3.62%4.09%3.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBDC and KNG have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, KNG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

KNG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.23%, compared with 8.59% for KNG.

FBDC is categorized as Financials Equities, while KNG is Dividend. Their fees differ too: 1.35% for FBDC and 0.75% for KNG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBDC and KNG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer