FBCV vs. SEIV

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) and SEIV (SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FBCV returned 16.46%/yr vs 25.70%/yr for SEIV. Their correlation of 0.83 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FBCV charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for SEIV.

Performance

FBCV vs. SEIV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 19.30% return, which is significantly lower than SEIV's 20.90% return.

FBCV

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 4.49%
• 6M: 14.03%
• YTD: 19.30%
• 1Y: 34.48%
• 3Y*: 16.46%
• 5Y*: 10.70%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 14.85%

SEIV

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: 4.15%
• 6M: 17.50%
• YTD: 20.90%
• 1Y: 42.78%
• 3Y*: 25.70%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	$777.37K	$549.15K	$439.38K
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	$9.14M	$9.18M	$6.19M

FBCV vs. SEIV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	19.30%	16.36%	10.26%	5.45%	0.45%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	20.90%	27.43%	19.73%	21.90%	-5.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCV and SEIV is 0.78, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 18, 2022	0.83

The correlation between FBCV and SEIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

FBCV vs. SEIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FBCV	SEIV
Financial Services	19.5%	23.0%
Technology	18.0%	17.0%
Healthcare	13.2%	18.1%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	18.5%
Industrials	12.0%	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	8.7%	3.9%
Energy	7.3%	0.9%
Communication Services	3.5%	6.5%
Basic Materials	2.9%	6.1%
Utilities	1.8%	2.4%
Real Estate	0.7%	1.2%

Return for Risk

FBCV vs. SEIV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBCV

FBCV Risk / Return Rank: 95
FBCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
FBCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FBCV Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FBCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FBCV Martin Ratio Rank: 95

SEIV

SEIV Risk / Return Rank: 96
SEIV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
SEIV Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Omega Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
SEIV Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBCV vs. SEIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCV	SEIV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.26	3.37	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.72	4.57	+0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.59	1.61	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.92	6.19	-1.27
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.60	22.94	-2.34

FBCV vs. SEIV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCV Sharpe Ratio is 3.26, which is comparable to the SEIV Sharpe Ratio of 3.37. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCV and SEIV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCV vs. SEIV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum SEIV drawdown of -18.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and SEIV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCV	SEIV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.55%	-18.18%	+2.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	-6.95%	-0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	-17.71%	+3.39%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.37%	-3.42%	+0.05%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.68%	1.87%	-0.19%

Volatility

FBCV vs. SEIV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is 3.10%, while SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF (SEIV) has a volatility of 3.44%. This indicates that FBCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SEIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCV	SEIV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.10%	3.44%	-0.34%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.94%	9.52%	-1.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	12.76%	-2.12%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.77%	16.54%	-2.77%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.64%	16.54%	-1.90%

FBCV vs. SEIV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SEIV's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCV vs. SEIV - Dividend Comparison

FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, more than SEIV's 1.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	2.41%	2.95%	1.75%	1.68%	2.01%	3.13%	0.44%
SEIV SEI QiM U.S. Large Cap Value Active ETF	1.43%	1.51%	1.66%	2.08%	1.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCV and SEIV in my portfolio?

FBCV and SEIV have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBCV or SEIV?

SEIV has higher volatility (3.44%) compared to FBCV (3.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCV dropped -15.55% vs SEIV's -18.18%.

Which ETF is better, FBCV or SEIV?

On 3-year performance, SEIV leads with 25.70% vs 16.46% for FBCV. On fees, SEIV is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, FBCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBCV or SEIV?

Over the 3-year period, SEIV has performed better with a 25.70% return vs 16.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBCV or SEIV?

SEIV is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBCV or SEIV?

FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.41%, compared with 1.43% for SEIV.

What is the main difference between FBCV and SEIV?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and SEI. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.15% for SEIV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SEIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.37 vs 3.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.