FBCV vs. DIA
FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) and DIA (State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - FBCV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while DIA is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Industrial Average. FBCV is actively managed, while DIA is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCV returned 10.50%/yr vs 10.36%/yr for DIA. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FBCV charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.16%/yr for DIA.
Performance
FBCV vs. DIA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than DIA's 9.95% return.
FBCV
- 1D
- 0.73%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 1Y
- 33.08%
- 3Y*
- 15.74%
- 5Y*
- 10.50%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 14.68%
DIA
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 8.01%
- YTD
- 9.95%
- 1Y
- 22.15%
- 3Y*
- 15.63%
- 5Y*
- 10.36%
- 10Y*
- 13.26%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.17%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.05B | $1.95B | $2.38B | |
| $595.39K | $468.65K | $409.72K |
FBCV vs. DIA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 18.06% | 16.36% | 10.26% | 5.45% | -2.26% | 26.18% | 17.93% |
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 9.95% | 14.71% | 14.82% | 16.02% | -7.02% | 20.83% | 17.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCV and DIA is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.82 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between FBCV and DIA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.
FBCV vs. DIA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FBCV
DIA
Financial Services
Technology
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Communication Services
Basic Materials
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Financial Services
FBCV
DIA
Technology
FBCV
DIA
Healthcare
FBCV
DIA
Consumer Cyclical
FBCV
DIA
Industrials
FBCV
DIA
Consumer Defensive
FBCV
DIA
Energy
FBCV
DIA
Communication Services
FBCV
DIA
Basic Materials
FBCV
DIA
Utilities
FBCV
DIA
-
Real Estate
FBCV
DIA
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCV vs. DIA — Risk / Return Rank
FBCV
DIA
FBCV vs. DIA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.94 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.54 | 1.30 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.52 | 2.12 | +2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.92 | 8.21 | +10.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCV vs. DIA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, smaller than the maximum DIA drawdown of -51.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and DIA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.55% | -51.87% | +36.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.04% | -9.76% | +2.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.32% | -15.95% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.55% | -20.76% | +5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -36.70% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.06% | +1.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.37% | -7.11% | +3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.68% | 2.52% | -0.84% |
Volatility
FBCV vs. DIA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) is 3.07%, while State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust (DIA) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that FBCV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DIA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCV | DIA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.07% | 3.74% | -0.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.88% | 9.82% | -1.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 12.52% | -1.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.76% | 14.83% | -1.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.64% | 17.53% | -2.89% |
FBCV vs. DIA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than DIA's 0.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCV vs. DIA - Dividend Comparison
FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.43%, more than DIA's 1.37% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DIA State Street SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF Trust | 1.37% | 1.43% | 1.61% | 1.81% | 1.91% | 1.58% | 1.87% | 1.85% | 2.24% | 1.97% | 2.26% | 2.33% |
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF | 2.43% | 2.95% | 1.75% | 1.68% | 2.01% | 3.13% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCV and DIA have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DIA has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to FBCV (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCV dropped -15.55% vs DIA's -51.87%.
On 5-year performance, FBCV leads with 10.50% vs 10.36% for DIA. On fees, DIA is cheaper at 0.16% per year. On volatility, FBCV has been the lower-risk option at 3.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FBCV has performed better with a 10.50% return vs 10.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DIA is cheaper with a 0.16% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.
FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.43%, compared with 1.37% for DIA.
FBCV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while DIA is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.16% for DIA.
FBCV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCV and DIA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer