FBCV vs. KWIN

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FBCV (Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF) and KWIN (KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. FBCV is actively managed, while KWIN is passively managed. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBCV charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.51%/yr for KWIN.

Performance

FBCV vs. KWIN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCV achieves a 14.67% return, which is significantly higher than KWIN's 1.59% return.

FBCV

• 1D: 0.49%
• 1M: 3.29%
• 6M: 11.64%
• YTD: 14.67%
• 1Y: 26.92%
• 3Y*: 15.78%
• 5Y*: 9.99%
• 10Y*: —

KWIN

• 1D: 0.06%
• 1M: 0.13%
• 6M: 1.08%
• YTD: 1.59%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCV vs. KWIN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	14.67%	5.69%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	1.59%	0.61%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCV and KWIN is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	0.12

Return for Risk

FBCV vs. KWIN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCV

FBCV Risk / Return Rank: 90
FBCV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FBCV Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
FBCV Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FBCV Calmar Ratio Rank: 86
FBCV Martin Ratio Rank: 89

KWIN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCV vs. KWIN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF (FBCV) and KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF (KWIN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCV	KWIN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.55	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.70	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.84	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.68	—	—

Drawdowns

FBCV vs. KWIN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCV drawdown since its inception was -15.55%, which is greater than KWIN's maximum drawdown of -1.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCV and KWIN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCV	KWIN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.55%	-1.50%	-14.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.32%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.55%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-1.44%	+1.44%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.40%	-0.25%	-3.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.72%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FBCV	KWIN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.84%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	7.74%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.64%	4.16%	+6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.78%	4.16%	+9.62%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.67%	4.16%	+10.51%

FBCV vs. KWIN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCV has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than KWIN's 0.51% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCV vs. KWIN - Dividend Comparison

FBCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.50%, while KWIN has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCV Fidelity Blue Chip Value ETF	2.50%	2.95%	1.75%	1.68%	2.01%	3.13%	0.44%
KWIN KraneShares Wahed Alternative Income Index ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCV and KWIN in my portfolio?

FBCV and KWIN have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, FBCV or KWIN?

On fees, KWIN is cheaper at 0.51% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBCV or KWIN?

KWIN is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for FBCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBCV or KWIN?

FBCV has the higher dividend yield at 2.50%, compared with 0.00% for KWIN.

What is the main difference between FBCV and KWIN?

They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and KraneShares. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for FBCV and 0.51% for KWIN.