PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FBCKX vs. SICIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly higher than SICIX's 2.55% return.


FBCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.11%
YTD
18.59%
6M
19.80%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SICIX

1D
0.09%
1M
0.72%
YTD
2.55%
6M
2.85%
1Y
7.02%
3Y*
6.58%
5Y*
3.24%
10Y*
3.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between FBCKX and SICIX is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FBCKX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCKX
FBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

SICIX
SICIX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
SICIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SICIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
SICIX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
SICIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
SICIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FBCKXSICIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.48

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.63

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

10.22

+5.39

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the SICIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCKX and SICIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FBCKXSICIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.49

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.80

+0.45

Drawdowns

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCKX drawdown since its inception was -27.06%, roughly equal to the maximum SICIX drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCKX and SICIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FBCKXSICIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-27.62%

+0.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-2.65%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.94%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.26%

+0.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-3.57%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

0.68%

+2.29%

Volatility

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) has a higher volatility of 4.14% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 0.74%. This indicates that FBCKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FBCKXSICIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

0.74%

+3.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

2.11%

+10.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

2.80%

+14.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

3.88%

+20.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

3.90%

+20.02%

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCKX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.


Dividends

FBCKX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison

FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than SICIX's 2.83% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FBCKX
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z
1.60%1.90%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SICIX
SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund
2.83%2.87%3.67%2.80%4.69%3.46%1.84%2.91%1.80%1.81%1.64%1.97%

Frequently Asked Questions


FBCKX and SICIX have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FBCKX has higher volatility (4.14%) compared to SICIX (0.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCKX dropped -27.06% vs SICIX's -27.62%.

FBCKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCKX and SICIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer