PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FBCKX (Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z) and EIT-UN.TO (Canoe EIT Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, FBCKX returned 45.08% vs 24.01% for EIT-UN.TO. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBCKX charges 0.61%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for EIT-UN.TO.

Performance

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

FBCKX is traded in USD, while EIT-UN.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the EIT-UN.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCKX achieves a 18.59% return, which is significantly lower than EIT-UN.TO's 26.21% return.

FBCKX

1D
0.76%
1M
9.11%
YTD
18.59%
6M
19.80%
1Y
45.08%
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—

EIT-UN.TO

1D
22.76%
1M
21.68%
YTD
26.21%
6M
34.50%
1Y
24.01%
3Y*
20.71%
5Y*
124.78%
10Y*
117.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)20252024
FBCKX
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z		18.59%19.99%7.26%
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		26.21%8.40%6.89%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCKX and EIT-UN.TO is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 15, 2024

0.26

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z

Canoe EIT Income Fund

Often compared with FBCKX:
FBCKX vs. DMAFBCKX vs. FCNTXFBCKX vs. FCSRXFBCKX vs. BLNDXFBCKX vs. CSTAXFBCKX vs. EKBAXFBCKX vs. FBGRX
Often compared with EIT-UN.TO:
EIT-UN.TO vs. HDIV.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. DFN.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. MNS.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. HDIF.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. ZWC.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. HYLD.TOEIT-UN.TO vs. XEQT.TO

Return for Risk

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
FBCKX
FBCKX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
FBCKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FBCKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FBCKX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
FBCKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
FBCKX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
EIT-UN.TO
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) and Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

FBCKXEIT-UN.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.67
0.94

+1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.42
2.38

+1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.69

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

11.06

-7.37

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.61

26.71

-11.10

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCKX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is higher than the EIT-UN.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCKX and EIT-UN.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

FBCKXEIT-UN.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

0.94

+1.73

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

—

0.11

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.12

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.09

+1.16

Drawdowns

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCKX drawdown since its inception was -27.06%, smaller than the maximum EIT-UN.TO drawdown of -54.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCKX and EIT-UN.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

FBCKXEIT-UN.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.06%

-54.80%

+27.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.63%

-2.18%

-10.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

—

-10.16%

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

—

-22.40%

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-54.80%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.04%

-6.33%

+2.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.97%

6.75%

-3.78%

Volatility

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z (FBCKX) is 4.14%, while Canoe EIT Income Fund (EIT-UN.TO) has a volatility of 20.58%. This indicates that FBCKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EIT-UN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

FBCKXEIT-UN.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.14%

20.58%

-16.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.00%

21.13%

-8.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.43%

25.66%

-8.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.92%

1,192.51%

-1,168.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.92%

1,019.40%

-995.48%

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCKX has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than EIT-UN.TO's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCKX vs. EIT-UN.TO - Dividend Comparison

FBCKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, less than EIT-UN.TO's 10.19% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EIT-UN.TO
Canoe EIT Income Fund		10.19%12.56%7.90%9.29%8.97%104.98%108.64%11.53%11.62%11.01%10.06%10.71%
FBCKX
Fidelity Advisor Blue Chip Growth Fund Class Z		1.60%1.90%2.12%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

FBCKX and EIT-UN.TO have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FBCKX and EIT-UN.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer