FBCGX vs. FGKFX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

FBCGX (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund) and FGKFX (Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds from Fidelity. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, FBCGX returned 15.57%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for FGKFX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. Both charge a 0.45% expense ratio.

Performance

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCGX achieves a 16.59% return, which is significantly lower than FGKFX's 22.73% return.

FBCGX

• 1D: -1.71%
• 1M: 3.47%
• YTD: 16.59%
• 6M: 15.24%
• 1Y: 40.13%
• 3Y*: 30.77%
• 5Y*: 15.57%
• 10Y*: —

FGKFX

• 1D: -1.20%
• 1M: 1.38%
• YTD: 22.73%
• 6M: 16.53%
• 1Y: 48.45%
• 3Y*: 31.24%
• 5Y*: 16.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	16.59%	21.33%	38.15%	55.57%	-37.84%	23.00%	62.92%	16.20%
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	22.73%	21.67%	35.46%	46.02%	-32.62%	22.06%	68.76%	15.07%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCGX and FGKFX is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.98
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019	0.98

The correlation between FBCGX and FGKFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBCGX vs. FGKFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCGX

FBCGX Risk / Return Rank: 66
FBCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 65
FBCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FBCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
FBCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
FBCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 77

FGKFX

FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 81
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 70
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) and Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCGX	FGKFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.17	2.53	-0.36
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.84	3.14	-0.29
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.42	-0.05
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.29	4.40	-1.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.41	17.06	-3.65

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.17, which is comparable to the FGKFX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCGX and FGKFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCGX drawdown since its inception was -42.55%, which is greater than FGKFX's maximum drawdown of -40.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCGX and FGKFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCGX	FGKFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.55%	-40.14%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.64%	-11.40%	-1.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-26.83%	-27.38%	+0.55%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-42.55%	-40.14%	-2.41%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.03%	-1.75%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.85%	-9.96%	+1.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	2.93%	+0.16%

Volatility

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund (FBCGX) has a higher volatility of 8.31% compared to Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) at 7.66%. This indicates that FBCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGKFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCGX	FGKFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.31%	7.66%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.06%	15.78%	-0.72%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.18%	19.83%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.19%	24.33%	+0.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.93%	25.79%	-0.86%

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FBCGX and FGKFX have an expense ratio of 0.45%.

Dividends

FBCGX vs. FGKFX - Dividend Comparison

FBCGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%, while FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FBCGX Fidelity Blue Chip Growth K6 Fund	0.83%	0.97%	0.62%	0.26%	0.12%	6.71%	1.26%	0.28%	0.46%	0.13%
FGKFX Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.10%	0.18%	2.64%	0.93%	0.06%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCGX and FGKFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.97, FBCGX and FGKFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FBCGX or FGKFX?

FBCGX has higher volatility (8.31%) compared to FGKFX (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCGX dropped -42.55% vs FGKFX's -40.14%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.53 vs 2.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.