FBCG vs. SPIT
FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) and SPIT (F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.79 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBCG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for SPIT.
Performance
FBCG vs. SPIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly lower than SPIT's 26.92% return.
FBCG
- 1D
- 2.21%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- 6M
- 11.39%
- YTD
- 11.42%
- 1Y
- 24.47%
- 3Y*
- 26.40%
- 5Y*
- 13.15%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 19.73%
SPIT
- 1D
- 1.99%
- 1M
- -3.14%
- 6M
- 17.82%
- YTD
- 26.92%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $37.99M | $34.97M | $38.44M | |
| $212.31K | $271.42K | $193.26K |
FBCG vs. SPIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.42% | 2.17% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 26.92% | 5.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCG and SPIT is 0.79, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2025 | 0.79 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCG vs. SPIT — Risk / Return Rank
FBCG
SPIT
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FBCG vs. SPIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF (SPIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.52 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCG vs. SPIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than SPIT's maximum drawdown of -12.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and SPIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -12.49% | -31.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | -5.71% | +1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.31% | -2.87% | -8.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility
FBCG vs. SPIT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCG | SPIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.68% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.57% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.68% | 26.61% | -5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.11% | 26.61% | -0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.74% | 26.61% | -0.87% |
FBCG vs. SPIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than SPIT's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBCG vs. SPIT - Dividend Comparison
FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, less than SPIT's 5.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
SPIT F/m Emerald Special Situations ETF | 5.66% | 7.18% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCG and SPIT have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FBCG is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FBCG is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for SPIT.
SPIT has the higher dividend yield at 5.66%, compared with 0.04% for FBCG.
They also come from different issuers: Fidelity and F/m. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FBCG and 0.89% for SPIT.
Find the right allocation for FBCG and SPIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer