FBCG vs. IONQ
FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) is Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while IONQ (IonQ, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, FBCG returned 14.46%/yr vs 40.49%/yr for IONQ. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
FBCG vs. IONQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 11.31% return, which is significantly lower than IONQ's 28.93% return.
FBCG
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- YTD
- 11.31%
- 6M
- 12.74%
- 1Y
- 32.07%
- 3Y*
- 28.04%
- 5Y*
- 14.46%
- 10Y*
- —
IONQ
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 4.69%
- YTD
- 28.93%
- 6M
- 14.90%
- 1Y
- 49.44%
- 3Y*
- 75.90%
- 5Y*
- 40.49%
- 10Y*
- —
FBCG vs. IONQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 11.31% | 18.60% | 39.05% | 57.98% | -39.10% | 21.34% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 28.93% | 7.42% | 237.13% | 259.13% | -79.34% | 50.11% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBCG and IONQ is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2021 | 0.53 |
The correlation between FBCG and IONQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.42 (1 year) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBCG vs. IONQ — Risk / Return Rank
FBCG
IONQ
FBCG vs. IONQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and IonQ, Inc. (IONQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FBCG | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.13 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.16 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.12 | 0.73 | +1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.07 | 1.33 | +6.74 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FBCG vs. IONQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum IONQ drawdown of -90.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and IONQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBCG | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.56% | -90.00% | +46.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.17% | -67.61% | +52.44% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.89% | -67.61% | +39.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -43.56% | -90.00% | +46.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.71% | -29.53% | +24.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.45% | -50.88% | +39.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 37.20% | -33.21% |
Volatility
FBCG vs. IONQ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 7.21%, while IonQ, Inc. (IONQ) has a volatility of 31.60%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IONQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBCG | IONQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.21% | 31.60% | -24.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.09% | 68.80% | -53.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.38% | 93.28% | -73.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.90% | 100.48% | -74.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.77% | 97.53% | -71.76% |
Dividends
FBCG vs. IONQ - Dividend Comparison
FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while IONQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF | 0.04% | 0.05% | 0.12% | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.01% |
IONQ IonQ, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBCG and IONQ have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
IONQ has higher volatility (31.60%) compared to FBCG (7.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs IONQ's -90.00%.
FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.66 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBCG and IONQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer