FBCG vs. FETH

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FBCG (Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF) and FETH (Fidelity Ethereum Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FBCG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FETH is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. FBCG is actively managed, while FETH is passively managed. Over the past year, FBCG returned 24.47% vs -46.78% for FETH. Their 0.51 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FBCG charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for FETH.

Performance

FBCG vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a 11.42% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -37.15% return.

FBCG

• 1D: 2.21%
• 1M: 0.02%
• 6M: 11.39%
• YTD: 11.42%
• 1Y: 24.47%
• 3Y*: 26.40%
• 5Y*: 13.15%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 19.73%

FETH

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: 9.86%
• 6M: -19.58%
• YTD: -37.15%
• 1Y: -46.78%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: -26.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	$37.99M	$34.97M	$38.44M
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	$29.41M	$29.69M	$35.01M

FBCG vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	11.42%	18.60%	9.73%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-37.15%	-11.37%	-4.68%

Correlation

The correlation between FBCG and FETH is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.51

The correlation between FBCG and FETH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FBCG vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 46
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 44
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 48

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 4
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FBCG vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FBCG	FETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.19	-0.70	+1.89
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.71	-0.85	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.21	0.91	+0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.62	-0.69	+2.31
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.52	-1.03	+6.54

FBCG vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCG Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of -0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCG and FETH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FBCG vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -67.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and FETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCG	FETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.56%	-67.94%	+24.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-67.94%	+52.77%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.89%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.62%	-61.55%	+56.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.31%	-35.30%	+23.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.45%	45.61%	-41.16%

Volatility

FBCG vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) is 6.68%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 12.28%. This indicates that FBCG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCG	FETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.68%	12.28%	-5.60%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.57%	45.60%	-29.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.68%	67.10%	-46.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.11%	71.16%	-45.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.74%	71.16%	-45.42%

FBCG vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FBCG vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.04%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FBCG and FETH in my portfolio?

FBCG and FETH have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FBCG or FETH?

FETH has higher volatility (12.28%) compared to FBCG (6.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBCG dropped -43.56% vs FETH's -67.94%.

Which ETF is better, FBCG or FETH?

On 1-year performance, FBCG leads with 24.47% vs -46.78% for FETH. On fees, FETH is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, FBCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.68%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FBCG or FETH?

Over the 1-year period, FBCG has performed better with a 24.47% return vs -46.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FBCG or FETH?

FETH is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FBCG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FBCG or FETH?

FBCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.04%, compared with 0.00% for FETH.

What is the main difference between FBCG and FETH?

FBCG is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while FETH is Cryptocurrency. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FBCG and 0.25% for FETH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FBCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.19 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.