FBCG vs. FELG

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG).

FBCG and FELG are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FBCG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 3, 2020. FELG is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Nov 20, 2023.

Performance

FBCG vs. FELG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FBCG vs. FELG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	-8.61%	18.60%	39.05%	4.84%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	-10.02%	18.44%	35.45%	4.20%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FBCG achieves a -8.61% return, which is significantly higher than FELG's -10.02% return.

FBCG

• 1D: 4.81%
• 1M: -5.43%
• YTD: -8.61%
• 6M: -6.56%
• 1Y: 25.45%
• 3Y*: 25.41%
• 5Y*: 10.98%
• 10Y*: —

FELG

• 1D: 3.91%
• 1M: -5.12%
• YTD: -10.02%
• 6M: -8.66%
• 1Y: 19.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FBCG vs. FELG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FBCG has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than FELG's 0.18% expense ratio.

FBCG

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF

FELG

Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF

Return for Risk

FBCG vs. FELG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FBCG

FBCG Risk / Return Rank: 64
FBCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
FBCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FBCG Omega Ratio Rank: 62
FBCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
FBCG Martin Ratio Rank: 64

FELG

FELG Risk / Return Rank: 53
FELG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
FELG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FELG Omega Ratio Rank: 56
FELG Calmar Ratio Rank: 53
FELG Martin Ratio Rank: 47

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FBCG vs. FELG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) and Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FBCG	FELG	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.97	0.87	+0.11
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.40	+0.14
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.20	+0.02
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	1.22	+0.43
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.92	4.23	+1.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FBCG vs. FELG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FBCG Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is comparable to the FELG Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FBCG and FELG, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FBCG	FELG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97	0.87	+0.11
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.43	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.67	0.94	-0.28

Correlation

The correlation between FBCG and FELG is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

FBCG vs. FELG - Dividend Comparison

FBCG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.05%, less than FELG's 0.41% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FBCG Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF	0.05%	0.05%	0.12%	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%
FELG Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF	0.41%	0.38%	0.44%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FBCG vs. FELG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FBCG drawdown since its inception was -43.56%, which is greater than FELG's maximum drawdown of -23.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBCG and FELG.

Drawdown Indicators

	FBCG	FELG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-43.56%	-23.89%	-19.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.17%	-16.17%	+1.00%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-43.56%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.09%	-12.90%	+1.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.79%	-3.56%	-8.23%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.23%	4.67%	-0.44%

Volatility

FBCG vs. FELG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Blue Chip Growth ETF (FBCG) has a higher volatility of 8.22% compared to Fidelity Enhanced Large Cap Growth ETF (FELG) at 6.85%. This indicates that FBCG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FELG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FBCG	FELG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.22%	6.85%	+1.37%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.74%	12.41%	+2.33%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	26.28%	22.58%	+3.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.82%	20.24%	+5.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	20.24%	+5.68%