FBAOX vs. TIBIX
FBAOX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A) and TIBIX (Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, FBAOX returned 24.56% vs 39.83% for TIBIX. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FBAOX charges 0.76%/yr vs 0.93%/yr for TIBIX.
Performance
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAOX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than TIBIX's 17.96% return.
FBAOX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TIBIX
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 3.13%
- YTD
- 17.96%
- 6M
- 21.37%
- 1Y
- 39.83%
- 3Y*
- 26.83%
- 5Y*
- 16.44%
- 10Y*
- 12.73%
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 10.13% | 14.81% | 4.65% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 17.96% | 37.01% | -1.37% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAOX and TIBIX is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.56 |
The correlation between FBAOX and TIBIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAOX vs. TIBIX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAOX
TIBIX
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAOX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.73 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.96 | -0.40 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 7.48 | -3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.55 | 29.20 | -10.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAOX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 4.77 | -1.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.48 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.95 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.77 | +0.84 |
Drawdowns
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum TIBIX drawdown of -48.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and TIBIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAOX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -48.88% | +36.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -5.39% | -1.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -20.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -5.96% | +4.49% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.38% | -0.03% |
Volatility
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) is 2.59%, while Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I (TIBIX) has a volatility of 3.12%. This indicates that FBAOX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TIBIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAOX | TIBIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 3.12% | -0.53% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 6.99% | -0.19% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 8.46% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 11.16% | +0.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 13.50% | -1.99% |
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than TIBIX's 0.93% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAOX vs. TIBIX - Dividend Comparison
FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, less than TIBIX's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 4.88% | 5.40% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIBIX Thornburg Investment Income Builder Fund Class I | 5.03% | 5.83% | 5.67% | 4.89% | 5.89% | 5.33% | 4.31% | 4.46% | 4.77% | 4.52% | 4.14% | 4.66% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBAOX and TIBIX have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TIBIX has higher volatility (3.12%) compared to FBAOX (2.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs TIBIX's -48.88%.
TIBIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.77 vs 2.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAOX and TIBIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer