FBAOX vs. AAAAX
FBAOX (Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A) and AAAAX (DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past year, FBAOX returned 24.56% vs 16.81% for AAAAX. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FBAOX charges 0.76%/yr vs 1.22%/yr for AAAAX.
Performance
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FBAOX achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly lower than AAAAX's 10.64% return.
FBAOX
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 4.01%
- YTD
- 10.13%
- 6M
- 10.35%
- 1Y
- 24.56%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AAAAX
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- 10.64%
- 6M
- 11.14%
- 1Y
- 16.81%
- 3Y*
- 11.38%
- 5Y*
- 5.03%
- 10Y*
- 7.18%
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 10.13% | 14.81% | 4.65% |
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 10.64% | 12.82% | -6.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FBAOX and AAAAX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.32 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2024 | 0.42 |
The correlation between FBAOX and AAAAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.32 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FBAOX vs. AAAAX — Risk / Return Rank
FBAOX
AAAAX
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FBAOX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.35 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | 2.94 | +0.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.55 | 10.79 | +7.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FBAOX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.93 | 1.85 | +1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.42 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | 0.39 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FBAOX drawdown since its inception was -12.61%, smaller than the maximum AAAAX drawdown of -40.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FBAOX and AAAAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FBAOX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.61% | -40.47% | +27.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.48% | -5.68% | -0.80% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -10.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -2.77% | +2.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.47% | -6.85% | +5.38% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.35% | 1.54% | -0.19% |
Volatility
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A (FBAOX) and DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A (AAAAX) have volatilities of 2.59% and 2.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FBAOX | AAAAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.59% | 2.54% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.80% | 7.27% | -0.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.57% | 9.02% | -0.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 12.11% | -0.60% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.51% | 12.69% | -1.18% |
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FBAOX has a 0.76% expense ratio, which is lower than AAAAX's 1.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
FBAOX vs. AAAAX - Dividend Comparison
FBAOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.88%, more than AAAAX's 3.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AAAAX DWS RREEF Real Assets Fund - Class A | 3.20% | 3.54% | 2.45% | 2.08% | 4.17% | 2.31% | 1.33% | 1.81% | 1.61% | 1.52% | 1.47% | 2.15% |
FBAOX Fidelity Advisor Balanced Fund Class A | 4.88% | 5.40% | 6.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FBAOX and AAAAX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FBAOX has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to AAAAX (2.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FBAOX dropped -12.61% vs AAAAX's -40.47%.
FBAOX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.93 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FBAOX and AAAAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer