PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAX vs. DVYA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAX vs. DVYA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly lower than DVYA's 14.34% return. Over the past 10 years, FAX has underperformed DVYA with an annualized return of 3.06%, while DVYA has yielded a comparatively higher 7.39% annualized return.


FAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
0.75%
6M
2.50%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
3.06%

DVYA

1D
0.29%
1M
0.47%
YTD
14.34%
6M
15.45%
1Y
40.81%
3Y*
22.08%
5Y*
10.23%
10Y*
7.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAX vs. DVYA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
0.75%18.23%2.31%16.53%-22.83%-7.20%14.08%19.48%-12.72%14.65%
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
14.34%30.22%6.05%13.75%-2.17%3.41%-9.61%14.70%-14.87%16.99%

Correlation

The correlation between FAX and DVYA is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.29

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 27, 2012

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAX vs. DVYA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAX
FAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

DVYA
DVYA Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
DVYA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVYA Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVYA Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
DVYA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVYA Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAX vs. DVYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAXDVYADifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

3.16

-2.61

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

4.20

-3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.55

-0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

4.84

-4.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.38

17.66

-16.27

FAX vs. DVYA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is lower than the DVYA Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAX and DVYA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAXDVYADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

3.16

-2.61

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.68

-0.66

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.42

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.31

-0.14

Drawdowns

FAX vs. DVYA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAX drawdown since its inception was -63.96%, which is greater than DVYA's maximum drawdown of -45.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAX and DVYA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAXDVYADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.96%

-45.61%

-18.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-8.64%

-2.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-19.15%

+5.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-25.37%

-15.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.57%

-45.61%

+5.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-2.27%

-4.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-10.07%

-7.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

2.37%

+2.48%

Volatility

FAX vs. DVYA - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF (DVYA) at 3.94%. This indicates that FAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVYA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAXDVYADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.94%

+1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

10.39%

-0.49%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

12.97%

-0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

15.08%

+0.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

17.56%

-1.06%

FAX vs. DVYA - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAX has a 3.33% expense ratio, which is higher than DVYA's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAX vs. DVYA - Dividend Comparison

FAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than DVYA's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DVYA
iShares Asia/Pacific Dividend ETF
4.29%4.71%5.97%6.48%7.29%5.81%3.66%5.52%6.24%4.74%4.79%5.33%
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
13.52%12.91%13.45%12.18%12.55%8.64%7.42%8.29%10.85%8.61%9.07%9.19%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAX and DVYA have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to DVYA (3.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAX dropped -63.96% vs DVYA's -45.61%.

DVYA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAX and DVYA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer