PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAX vs. MSD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAX vs. MSD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAX achieves a 0.75% return, which is significantly higher than MSD's 0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FAX has underperformed MSD with an annualized return of 3.06%, while MSD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.37% annualized return.


FAX

1D
-0.14%
1M
-1.62%
YTD
0.75%
6M
2.50%
1Y
6.72%
3Y*
9.99%
5Y*
0.38%
10Y*
3.06%

MSD

1D
0.41%
1M
-2.28%
YTD
0.49%
6M
2.69%
1Y
2.94%
3Y*
16.04%
5Y*
4.22%
10Y*
5.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAX vs. MSD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
0.75%18.23%2.31%16.53%-22.83%-7.20%14.08%19.48%-12.72%14.65%
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
0.49%5.58%24.92%19.14%-22.10%2.20%0.73%24.38%-12.31%16.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FAX and MSD is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.42

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 1994

0.28

The correlation between FAX and MSD shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAX vs. MSD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAX
FAX Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
FAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
FAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

MSD
MSD Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
MSD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MSD Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
MSD Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
MSD Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
MSD Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAX vs. MSD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAXMSDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.55

0.29

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

0.83

0.46

+0.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.06

+0.05

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.60

0.30

+0.30

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

1.38

0.87

+0.51

FAX vs. MSD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAX Sharpe Ratio is 0.55, which is higher than the MSD Sharpe Ratio of 0.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAX and MSD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAXMSDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

0.29

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

0.30

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

0.37

-0.18

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

0.35

-0.18

Drawdowns

FAX vs. MSD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAX drawdown since its inception was -63.96%, which is greater than MSD's maximum drawdown of -58.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAX and MSD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAXMSDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.96%

-58.51%

-5.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.14%

-10.59%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.17%

-12.84%

-0.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.49%

-33.89%

-6.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.57%

-37.50%

-3.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.53%

-6.35%

-0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.85%

-11.30%

-6.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.85%

3.68%

+1.17%

Volatility

FAX vs. MSD - Volatility Comparison

abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc (FAX) has a higher volatility of 5.23% compared to Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc. (MSD) at 3.76%. This indicates that FAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MSD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAXMSDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.23%

3.76%

+1.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.90%

8.21%

+1.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.24%

10.23%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.92%

14.04%

+1.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.50%

14.75%

+1.75%

Dividends

FAX vs. MSD - Dividend Comparison

FAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.52%, more than MSD's 8.93% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAX
abrdn Asia-Pacific Income Fund Inc
13.52%12.91%13.45%12.18%12.55%8.64%7.42%8.29%10.85%8.61%9.07%9.19%
MSD
Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Debt Fund, Inc.
8.93%9.88%11.88%10.90%7.34%4.99%4.67%5.37%6.56%5.81%6.87%7.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAX and MSD have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAX has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to MSD (3.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAX dropped -63.96% vs MSD's -58.51%.

FAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.55 vs 0.29), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAX and MSD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer