FAUG vs. ROBT
FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAUG is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAUG returned 8.88%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for ROBT. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
FAUG vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 6.16% return, which is significantly lower than ROBT's 14.22% return.
FAUG
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 6.16%
- 6M
- 6.73%
- 1Y
- 18.00%
- 3Y*
- 14.48%
- 5Y*
- 8.88%
- 10Y*
- —
ROBT
- 1D
- -1.73%
- 1M
- 13.18%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 12.64%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 10.10%
- 5Y*
- 2.38%
- 10Y*
- —
FAUG vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 6.16% | 13.77% | 14.55% | 17.24% | -10.52% | 11.54% | 12.43% | 2.37% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 14.22% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 4.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAUG and ROBT is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 8, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between FAUG and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
FAUG vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAUG
ROBT
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
Technology
FAUG
ROBT
Financial Services
FAUG
ROBT
Communication Services
FAUG
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
FAUG
ROBT
Healthcare
FAUG
ROBT
Industrials
FAUG
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
FAUG
ROBT
Energy
FAUG
ROBT
Utilities
FAUG
ROBT
-
Real Estate
FAUG
ROBT
-
Basic Materials
FAUG
ROBT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAUG vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
FAUG
ROBT
FAUG vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAUG | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.50 | 1.22 | +0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.44 | 1.42 | +2.02 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.42 | 4.09 | +13.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAUG | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.51 | 1.32 | +1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 | 0.09 | +0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.35 | +0.43 |
Drawdowns
FAUG vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum ROBT drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAUG | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -44.47% | +22.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.26% | -21.66% | +16.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -27.68% | +14.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | -43.26% | +27.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.14% | -1.73% | +1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.83% | -15.97% | +13.14% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 7.53% | -6.49% |
Volatility
FAUG vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 0.94%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 6.46%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAUG | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.94% | 6.46% | -5.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.44% | 17.51% | -12.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.22% | 23.32% | -16.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.77% | 25.18% | -14.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.75% | 25.48% | -12.73% |
FAUG vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAUG vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
Neither FAUG nor ROBT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAUG and ROBT have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (6.46%) compared to FAUG (0.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, FAUG leads with 8.88% vs 2.38% for ROBT. On fees, ROBT is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 0.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FAUG has performed better with a 8.88% return vs 2.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ROBT is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.
FAUG and ROBT have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
FAUG is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.65% for ROBT.
FAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.51 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAUG and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer