PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAUG vs. RDVY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAUG vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 7.82% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return.


FAUG

1D
0.42%
1M
1.06%
6M
6.84%
YTD
7.82%
1Y
15.31%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
9.04%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
9.89%

RDVY

1D
0.36%
1M
1.19%
6M
12.71%
YTD
17.25%
1Y
30.74%
3Y*
19.76%
5Y*
12.89%
10Y*
16.25%
ALL TIME*
13.76%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$759.98K$698.39K$1.47M
$77.65M$79.19M$83.63M

FAUG vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
7.82%13.77%14.55%17.24%-10.52%11.54%12.43%2.03%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
17.25%18.90%16.41%20.38%-13.27%31.14%13.47%5.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and RDVY is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.81

The correlation between FAUG and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAUG vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAUG
RDVY

Technology

38.5%
19.4%

Financial Services

11.6%
38.9%

Communication Services

9.9%
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
11.1%

Healthcare

8.9%
5.6%

Industrials

8.4%
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
2.8%

Energy

3.0%
2.8%

Utilities

2.2%
1.4%

Real Estate

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

FAUG
38.5%
RDVY
19.4%

Financial Services

FAUG
11.6%
RDVY
38.9%

Communication Services

FAUG
9.9%
RDVY
4.2%

Consumer Cyclical

FAUG
9.5%
RDVY
11.1%

Healthcare

FAUG
8.9%
RDVY
5.6%

Industrials

FAUG
8.4%
RDVY
12.5%

Consumer Defensive

FAUG
4.5%
RDVY
2.8%

Energy

FAUG
3.0%
RDVY
2.8%

Utilities

FAUG
2.2%
RDVY
1.4%

Real Estate

FAUG
1.8%
RDVY

-

Basic Materials

FAUG
1.7%
RDVY

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAUG vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAUG
FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

RDVY
RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAUG vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAUGRDVYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.01

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.72

3.25

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.68

13.63

+0.05

FAUG vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUG and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum RDVY drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and RDVY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAUGRDVYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-40.60%

+18.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-9.04%

+3.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-19.11%

+6.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-25.32%

+9.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-4.95%

+2.18%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.05%

2.15%

-1.10%

Volatility

FAUG vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.49%, while First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAUGRDVYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

3.53%

-2.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.51%

11.46%

-5.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.16%

14.65%

-7.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.81%

18.92%

-8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.63%

21.03%

-8.40%

FAUG vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAUG vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RDVY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.83%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RDVY
First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF
0.83%1.11%1.64%2.09%2.21%1.04%1.53%1.55%1.68%1.25%2.07%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAUG and RDVY have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

RDVY has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to FAUG (1.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

On 5-year performance, RDVY leads with 12.89% vs 9.04% for FAUG. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.49%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 12.89% return vs 9.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.

RDVY has the higher dividend yield at 0.83%, compared with 0.00% for FAUG.

FAUG is categorized as Defined Outcome, while RDVY is Dividend. FAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.47% for RDVY.

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAUG and RDVY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer