FAUG vs. JULB

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and JULB (Aptus July Buffer ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. FAUG is passively managed, while JULB is actively managed. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JULB.

Performance

FAUG vs. JULB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 7.31% return, which is significantly lower than JULB's 8.30% return.

FAUG

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 1.46%
• 6M: 6.29%
• YTD: 7.31%
• 1Y: 15.11%
• 3Y*: 13.87%
• 5Y*: 8.97%
• 10Y*: —

JULB

• 1D: 0.27%
• 1M: 2.01%
• 6M: 7.34%
• YTD: 8.30%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAUG vs. JULB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	7.31%	2.42%
JULB Aptus July Buffer ETF	8.30%	2.44%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and JULB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 14, 2025	0.96

Return for Risk

FAUG vs. JULB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUG

FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 83
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 87

JULB

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUG vs. JULB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Aptus July Buffer ETF (JULB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAUG	JULB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.03	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.42	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.85	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.33	—	—

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. JULB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, which is greater than JULB's maximum drawdown of -5.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and JULB.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAUG	JULB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-5.24%	-17.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.80%	-0.79%	-2.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FAUG	JULB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.06%	6.74%	+0.32%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	6.74%	+4.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.67%	6.74%	+5.93%

FAUG vs. JULB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than JULB's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAUG vs. JULB - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAUG nor JULB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAUG and JULB in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FAUG and JULB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, FAUG or JULB?

On fees, JULB is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAUG or JULB?

JULB is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAUG or JULB?

FAUG and JULB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FAUG and JULB?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Aptus Capital Advisors. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.25% for JULB.