FAUG vs. CNAV

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and CNAV (Mohr Company Nav ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. FAUG is passively managed, while CNAV is actively managed. Over the past year, FAUG returned 18.25% vs 85.51% for CNAV. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 1.31%/yr for CNAV.

Performance

FAUG vs. CNAV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than CNAV's 55.93% return.

FAUG

• 1D: 0.01%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 6.33%
• 6M: 6.20%
• 1Y: 18.25%
• 3Y*: 14.11%
• 5Y*: 8.87%
• 10Y*: —

CNAV

• 1D: 3.09%
• 1M: 17.69%
• YTD: 55.93%
• 6M: 53.70%
• 1Y: 85.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAUG vs. CNAV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August	6.33%	13.77%	1.73%
CNAV Mohr Company Nav ETF	55.93%	16.80%	6.05%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and CNAV is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 1, 2024	0.76

The correlation between FAUG and CNAV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.74 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAUG vs. CNAV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUG

FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 83
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 87
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 86

CNAV

CNAV Risk / Return Rank: 90
CNAV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
CNAV Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
CNAV Omega Ratio Rank: 86
CNAV Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
CNAV Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUG vs. CNAV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAUG	CNAV	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.56	3.05	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.65	3.61	+0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.50	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.49	6.63	-3.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	17.57	26.35	-8.79

FAUG vs. CNAV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the CNAV Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUG and CNAV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. CNAV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum CNAV drawdown of -30.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and CNAV.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAUG	CNAV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.33%	-30.06%	+7.73%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.26%	-12.97%	+7.71%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.91%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.09%	0.00%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.82%	-5.38%	+2.56%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	3.26%	-2.22%

Volatility

FAUG vs. CNAV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.70%, while Mohr Company Nav ETF (CNAV) has a volatility of 14.93%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CNAV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAUG	CNAV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.70%	14.93%	-13.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.59%	24.63%	-19.04%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.17%	28.28%	-21.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.79%	28.63%	-17.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	28.63%	-15.91%

FAUG vs. CNAV - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is lower than CNAV's 1.31% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAUG vs. CNAV - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAUG nor CNAV has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAUG and CNAV in my portfolio?

FAUG and CNAV have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAUG or CNAV?

CNAV has higher volatility (14.93%) compared to FAUG (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs CNAV's -30.06%.

Which ETF is better, FAUG or CNAV?

On 1-year performance, CNAV leads with 85.51% vs 18.25% for FAUG. On fees, FAUG is cheaper at 0.85% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAUG or CNAV?

Over the 1-year period, CNAV has performed better with a 85.51% return vs 18.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAUG or CNAV?

FAUG is cheaper with a 0.85% expense ratio, compared with 1.31% for CNAV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAUG or CNAV?

FAUG and CNAV have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FAUG and CNAV?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Mohr. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 1.31% for CNAV.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CNAV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 2.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.