PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAUG vs. BBUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAUG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 9.41% return.


FAUG

1D
0.01%
1M
0.63%
YTD
6.33%
6M
6.20%
1Y
18.25%
3Y*
14.11%
5Y*
8.87%
10Y*

BBUS

1D
-0.31%
1M
0.15%
YTD
9.41%
6M
8.89%
1Y
26.13%
3Y*
21.38%
5Y*
13.03%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAUG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
6.33%13.77%14.55%17.24%-10.52%11.54%12.43%2.03%
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
9.41%17.77%24.89%27.20%-19.46%27.13%20.69%5.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FAUG and BBUS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019

0.95

The correlation between FAUG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAUG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAUG
BBUS

Technology

39.0%
38.1%

Financial Services

11.1%
11.2%

Communication Services

10.6%
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.9%
9.1%

Healthcare

8.3%
8.0%

Industrials

7.8%
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

4.5%
4.4%

Energy

3.1%
3.0%

Utilities

2.1%
2.6%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.7%

Basic Materials

1.7%
1.2%

Technology

FAUG
39.0%
BBUS
38.1%

Financial Services

FAUG
11.1%
BBUS
11.2%

Communication Services

FAUG
10.6%
BBUS
10.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FAUG
9.9%
BBUS
9.1%

Healthcare

FAUG
8.3%
BBUS
8.0%

Industrials

FAUG
7.8%
BBUS
7.4%

Consumer Defensive

FAUG
4.5%
BBUS
4.4%

Energy

FAUG
3.1%
BBUS
3.0%

Utilities

FAUG
2.1%
BBUS
2.6%

Real Estate

FAUG
1.8%
BBUS
1.7%

Basic Materials

FAUG
1.7%
BBUS
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAUG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAUG
FAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
FAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

BBUS
BBUS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BBUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBUS Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
BBUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBUS Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAUG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FAUGBBUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.38

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.49

2.85

+0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.57

12.65

+4.91

FAUG vs. BBUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAUG Sharpe Ratio is 2.56, which is comparable to the BBUS Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAUG and BBUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAUG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and BBUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAUGBBUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.33%

-35.35%

+13.02%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.26%

-9.21%

+3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.81%

-19.01%

+6.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.91%

-25.46%

+9.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-1.82%

+1.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.82%

-5.43%

+2.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.04%

2.07%

-1.03%

Volatility

FAUG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.70%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAUGBBUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.70%

4.70%

-3.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.59%

9.81%

-4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.17%

12.49%

-5.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.79%

17.12%

-6.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.72%

19.59%

-6.87%

FAUG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAUG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison

FAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBUS
JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF
0.99%1.07%1.21%1.38%1.57%1.11%1.43%1.37%
FAUG
FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, FAUG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BBUS has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FAUG (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs BBUS's -35.35%.

On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.03% vs 8.87% for FAUG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.

BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for FAUG.

FAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.02% for BBUS.

FAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAUG and BBUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer