FAUG vs. BBUS
FAUG (FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August) and BBUS (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - FAUG tracks the Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAUG returned 8.87%/yr vs 13.03%/yr for BBUS. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. FAUG charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
FAUG vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAUG achieves a 6.33% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 9.41% return.
FAUG
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 6.20%
- 1Y
- 18.25%
- 3Y*
- 14.11%
- 5Y*
- 8.87%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- 0.15%
- YTD
- 9.41%
- 6M
- 8.89%
- 1Y
- 26.13%
- 3Y*
- 21.38%
- 5Y*
- 13.03%
- 10Y*
- —
FAUG vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 6.33% | 13.77% | 14.55% | 17.24% | -10.52% | 11.54% | 12.43% | 2.03% |
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 9.41% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 5.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAUG and BBUS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2019 | 0.95 |
The correlation between FAUG and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
FAUG vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAUG
BBUS
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
FAUG
BBUS
Financial Services
FAUG
BBUS
Communication Services
FAUG
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
FAUG
BBUS
Healthcare
FAUG
BBUS
Industrials
FAUG
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
FAUG
BBUS
Energy
FAUG
BBUS
Utilities
FAUG
BBUS
Real Estate
FAUG
BBUS
Basic Materials
FAUG
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAUG vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
FAUG
BBUS
FAUG vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAUG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.45 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.51 | 1.38 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.49 | 2.85 | +0.64 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.57 | 12.65 | +4.91 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAUG vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAUG drawdown since its inception was -22.33%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAUG and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAUG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.33% | -35.35% | +13.02% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.26% | -9.21% | +3.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.81% | -19.01% | +6.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.91% | -25.46% | +9.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.09% | -1.82% | +1.73% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -5.43% | +2.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.04% | 2.07% | -1.03% |
Volatility
FAUG vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August (FAUG) is 1.70%, while JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) has a volatility of 4.70%. This indicates that FAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAUG | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 4.70% | -3.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.59% | 9.81% | -4.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.17% | 12.49% | -5.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.79% | 17.12% | -6.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.72% | 19.59% | -6.87% |
FAUG vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAUG has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAUG vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
FAUG has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBUS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.99% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% |
FAUG FT Cboe Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - August | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, FAUG and BBUS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
BBUS has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FAUG (1.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAUG dropped -22.33% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.03% vs 8.87% for FAUG. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, FAUG has been the lower-risk option at 1.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.03% return vs 8.87%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAUG.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.00% for FAUG.
FAUG tracks Cboe S&P 500 Buffer Protect Index August, while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAUG and 0.02% for BBUS.
FAUG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.56 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAUG and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer