PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAST vs. AAPL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FAST vs. AAPL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fastenal Company (FAST) and Apple Inc (AAPL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAST achieves a 16.13% return, which is significantly higher than AAPL's 9.24% return. Over the past 10 years, FAST has underperformed AAPL with an annualized return of 18.35%, while AAPL has yielded a comparatively higher 29.88% annualized return.


FAST

1D
-1.01%
1M
6.56%
YTD
16.13%
6M
9.45%
1Y
11.61%
3Y*
20.55%
5Y*
15.30%
10Y*
18.35%

AAPL

1D
1.82%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
9.24%
6M
8.34%
1Y
51.49%
3Y*
17.58%
5Y*
18.50%
10Y*
29.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAST vs. AAPL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAST
Fastenal Company
16.13%13.98%13.53%41.31%-24.34%34.06%36.60%45.08%-1.61%19.66%
AAPL
Apple Inc
9.24%9.05%30.71%49.01%-26.40%34.65%82.31%88.96%-5.39%48.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FAST and AAPL is 0.21, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.21

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.28

The correlation between FAST and AAPL shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (1 year) to 0.39 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

FAST:

$53.06B

AAPL:

$4.38T

EPS

FAST:

$1.13

AAPL:

$8.24

PE Ratio

FAST:

40.81

AAPL:

35.99

PEG Ratio

FAST:

4.79

AAPL:

4.74

PS Ratio

FAST:

6.28

AAPL:

9.77

PB Ratio

FAST:

13.30

AAPL:

41.11

Total Revenue (TTM)

FAST:

$8.44B

AAPL:

$451.44B

Gross Profit (TTM)

FAST:

$3.79B

AAPL:

$216.07B

EBITDA (TTM)

FAST:

$1.80B

AAPL:

$153.63B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAST vs. AAPL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAST
FAST Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
FAST Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAST Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAST Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
FAST Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAST Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank

AAPL
AAPL Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
AAPL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AAPL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9191
Sortino Ratio Rank
AAPL Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
AAPL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
AAPL Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAST vs. AAPL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fastenal Company (FAST) and Apple Inc (AAPL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASTAAPLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.41

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

3.75

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.06

9.31

-8.25

FAST vs. AAPL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAST Sharpe Ratio is 0.47, which is lower than the AAPL Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAST and AAPL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAST vs. AAPL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAST drawdown since its inception was -63.43%, smaller than the maximum AAPL drawdown of -81.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAST and AAPL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASTAAPLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.43%

-81.80%

+18.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.90%

-13.80%

-8.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.90%

-33.36%

+11.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.71%

-33.36%

+2.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.71%

-38.52%

+7.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.04%

-5.96%

-1.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.16%

-29.59%

+17.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.96%

5.54%

+5.42%

Volatility

FAST vs. AAPL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fastenal Company (FAST) is 6.33%, while Apple Inc (AAPL) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that FAST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AAPL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASTAAPLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.33%

7.00%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.21%

16.62%

+2.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.91%

22.70%

+2.21%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

27.52%

-3.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.78%

28.94%

-2.16%

Dividends

FAST vs. AAPL - Dividend Comparison

FAST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.00%, more than AAPL's 0.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AAPL
Apple Inc
0.35%0.38%0.40%0.49%0.70%0.49%0.61%1.04%1.79%1.45%1.93%1.93%
FAST
Fastenal Company
2.00%2.18%2.17%2.75%2.62%1.75%2.87%2.35%2.95%2.34%2.55%2.74%

Financials

FAST vs. AAPL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fastenal Company and Apple Inc. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B20222023202420252026
2.20B
111.18B
(FAST) Total Revenue
(AAPL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

FAST vs. AAPL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Fastenal Company and Apple Inc over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

42.0%44.0%46.0%48.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
44.6%
49.3%
Portfolio components
FAST - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a gross profit of 982.90M and revenue of 2.20B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.6%.

AAPL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a gross profit of 54.78B and revenue of 111.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 49.3%.

FAST - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported an operating income of 447.60M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in an operating margin of 20.3%.

AAPL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported an operating income of 35.89B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 32.3%.

FAST - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fastenal Company reported a net income of 339.80M and revenue of 2.20B, resulting in a net margin of 15.4%.

AAPL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Apple Inc reported a net income of 29.58B and revenue of 111.18B, resulting in a net margin of 26.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


FAST and AAPL have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AAPL has higher volatility (7.00%) compared to FAST (6.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAST dropped -63.43% vs AAPL's -81.80%.

AAPL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAST and AAPL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer