FASMX vs. FSIDX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX).
FASMX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 28, 1988. FSIDX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 23, 2003.
Performance
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | -2.02% | 14.94% | 8.46% | 13.09% | -14.93% | 9.86% | 14.72% | 18.25% | -5.51% | 11.73% |
FSIDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I | 3.31% | 12.99% | 11.46% | 9.45% | -9.90% | 18.98% | 11.25% | 22.47% | -4.43% | 11.26% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly lower than FSIDX's 3.31% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has underperformed FSIDX with an annualized return of 6.84%, while FSIDX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.
FASMX
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -5.86%
- YTD
- -2.02%
- 6M
- 0.38%
- 1Y
- 12.51%
- 3Y*
- 9.57%
- 5Y*
- 4.94%
- 10Y*
- 6.84%
FSIDX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -5.68%
- YTD
- 3.31%
- 6M
- 5.65%
- 1Y
- 15.08%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.71%
- 10Y*
- 9.19%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FSIDX's 0.72% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASMX vs. FSIDX — Risk / Return Rank
FASMX
FSIDX
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASMX | FSIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.87 | 1.87 | +0.01 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.29 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.71 | 1.54 | +0.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.35 | 7.63 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASMX | FSIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 1.34 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.54 | 0.71 | -0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.74 | 0.74 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.53 | +0.30 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASMX and FSIDX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Dividend Comparison
FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.74%, which matches FSIDX's 7.70% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund | 7.74% | 7.58% | 3.88% | 2.18% | 6.78% | 2.91% | 2.40% | 4.21% | 5.11% | 2.24% | 1.69% | 5.77% |
FSIDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I | 7.70% | 7.95% | 5.25% | 5.70% | 4.22% | 8.42% | 5.67% | 6.69% | 8.18% | 6.59% | 4.92% | 6.37% |
Drawdowns
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, smaller than the maximum FSIDX drawdown of -58.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and FSIDX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASMX | FSIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.75% | -58.94% | +21.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.84% | -9.55% | +2.71% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.54% | -17.10% | -3.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -21.27% | -30.01% | +8.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -5.78% | -0.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.13% | -6.38% | +2.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.59% | 1.93% | -0.34% |
Volatility
FASMX vs. FSIDX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) has a higher volatility of 3.59% compared to Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class I (FSIDX) at 3.38%. This indicates that FASMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSIDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASMX | FSIDX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.59% | 3.38% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.90% | 6.30% | -0.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.51% | 11.75% | -2.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.21% | 10.94% | -1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.24% | 12.39% | -3.15% |