FASMX vs. FAYZX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FASMX (Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund) and FAYZX (Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FASMX returned 7.77%/yr vs 9.07%/yr for FAYZX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FASMX charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FAYZX.

Performance

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASMX achieves a 9.03% return, which is significantly higher than FAYZX's 8.43% return. Over the past 10 years, FASMX has underperformed FAYZX with an annualized return of 7.77%, while FAYZX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.07% annualized return.

FASMX

• 1D: 0.38%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 9.03%
• 6M: 9.69%
• 1Y: 20.66%
• 3Y*: 13.10%
• 5Y*: 6.46%
• 10Y*: 7.77%

FAYZX

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: 1.04%
• YTD: 8.43%
• 6M: 7.67%
• 1Y: 20.93%
• 3Y*: 12.87%
• 5Y*: 6.37%
• 10Y*: 9.07%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	9.03%	14.94%	8.46%	13.09%	-14.93%	9.86%	14.72%	18.25%	-5.51%	11.73%
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I	8.43%	14.13%	9.59%	11.73%	-13.69%	17.17%	16.39%	23.15%	-3.01%	6.21%

Correlation

The correlation between FASMX and FAYZX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.86
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.88
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016	0.88

The correlation between FASMX and FAYZX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FASMX vs. FAYZX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FASMX

FASMX Risk / Return Rank: 79
FASMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FASMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
FASMX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
FASMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FASMX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FAYZX

FAYZX Risk / Return Rank: 57
FAYZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FAYZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
FAYZX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FAYZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 73
FAYZX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FASMX	FAYZX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.65	2.19	+0.45
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.78	2.99	+0.79
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	1.39	+0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.38	3.37	+0.02
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.80	11.63	+3.17
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASMX Sharpe Ratio is 2.65, which is comparable to the FAYZX Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASMX and FAYZX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FASMX	FAYZX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.65	2.19	+0.45
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	0.65	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.93	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.85	0.96	-0.10

Drawdowns

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASMX drawdown since its inception was -37.75%, which is greater than FAYZX's maximum drawdown of -21.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASMX and FAYZX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASMX	FAYZX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-37.75%	-21.64%	-16.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.19%	-6.47%	+0.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.28%	-13.18%	+3.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-20.54%	-18.13%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-21.27%	-21.64%	+0.37%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.71%	+0.71%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.12%	-3.41%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.41%	1.87%	-0.46%

Volatility

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund (FASMX) and Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I (FAYZX) have volatilities of 2.67% and 2.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASMX	FAYZX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.67%	2.56%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.50%	7.44%	-0.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	7.91%	9.95%	-2.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.32%	9.82%	-0.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.31%	9.84%	-0.53%

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASMX has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than FAYZX's 0.80% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASMX vs. FAYZX - Dividend Comparison

FASMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.93%, more than FAYZX's 3.43% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASMX Fidelity Asset Manager 50% Fund	6.93%	7.58%	3.88%	2.18%	6.78%	2.91%	2.40%	4.21%	5.11%	2.24%	1.69%	5.77%
FAYZX Fidelity Advisor Multi-Asset Income Fund Class I	3.43%	3.77%	3.51%	4.21%	3.73%	2.79%	3.27%	2.82%	2.96%	3.34%	8.29%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASMX and FAYZX in my portfolio?

FASMX and FAYZX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FASMX or FAYZX?

FASMX has higher volatility (2.67%) compared to FAYZX (2.56%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASMX dropped -37.75% vs FAYZX's -21.64%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FASMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.65 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.