FASEX vs. QQQX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX).
FASEX is managed by Nuveen. It was launched on Dec 22, 1987. QQQX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq 100 Index. It was launched on Jan 30, 2007.
Performance
FASEX vs. QQQX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FASEX vs. QQQX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 2.64% | 9.68% | 10.40% | 14.20% | -10.63% | 34.84% | 1.19% | 26.68% | -13.00% | 19.23% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | -4.39% | 14.87% | 25.61% | 21.68% | -27.39% | 25.32% | 15.75% | 28.83% | -11.68% | 39.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 2.64% return, which is significantly higher than QQQX's -4.39% return. Over the past 10 years, FASEX has underperformed QQQX with an annualized return of 9.89%, while QQQX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.43% annualized return.
FASEX
- 1D
- -0.41%
- 1M
- -6.34%
- YTD
- 2.64%
- 6M
- 3.59%
- 1Y
- 17.10%
- 3Y*
- 11.79%
- 5Y*
- 7.98%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
QQQX
- 1D
- 4.83%
- 1M
- -2.23%
- YTD
- -4.39%
- 6M
- 1.33%
- 1Y
- 22.19%
- 3Y*
- 12.04%
- 5Y*
- 7.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.43%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FASEX vs. QQQX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQX's 0.92% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FASEX vs. QQQX — Risk / Return Rank
FASEX
QQQX
FASEX vs. QQQX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FASEX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.96 | 1.07 | -0.11 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.42 | 1.61 | -0.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.25 | -0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.07 | 1.73 | -0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.84 | 8.57 | -3.73 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FASEX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.96 | 1.07 | -0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.37 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | 0.55 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.45 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between FASEX and QQQX is 0.64, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
FASEX vs. QQQX - Dividend Comparison
FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.29%, more than QQQX's 8.61% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FASEX Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund | 14.29% | 14.67% | 5.29% | 3.12% | 6.32% | 4.02% | 1.06% | 0.89% | 4.48% | 7.93% | 3.67% | 3.49% |
QQQX Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund | 8.61% | 7.85% | 6.73% | 7.26% | 9.66% | 5.85% | 6.00% | 6.49% | 8.40% | 5.95% | 7.54% | 7.23% |
Drawdowns
FASEX vs. QQQX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, roughly equal to the maximum QQQX drawdown of -57.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and QQQX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FASEX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.57% | -57.25% | +1.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.62% | -12.93% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -22.26% | -29.33% | +7.07% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.56% | -35.96% | -8.60% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.83% | -4.72% | -2.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.97% | -8.09% | -0.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.01% | 2.61% | +0.40% |
Volatility
FASEX vs. QQQX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) is 5.25%, while Nuveen NASDAQ 100 Dynamic Overwrite Fund (QQQX) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that FASEX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FASEX | QQQX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.25% | 7.11% | -1.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.91% | 11.38% | -1.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.72% | 20.76% | -2.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.04% | 19.73% | -1.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.17% | 21.02% | -0.85% |