PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FASEX vs. HAMVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASEX achieves a 19.56% return, which is significantly lower than HAMVX's 24.15% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FASEX having a 11.00% annualized return and HAMVX not far behind at 10.88%.


FASEX

1D
0.70%
1M
-0.26%
6M
14.33%
YTD
19.56%
1Y
28.65%
3Y*
14.01%
5Y*
9.89%
10Y*
11.00%
ALL TIME*
9.47%

HAMVX

1D
-0.20%
1M
3.58%
6M
18.01%
YTD
24.15%
1Y
41.11%
3Y*
19.07%
5Y*
13.22%
10Y*
10.88%
ALL TIME*
8.92%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
19.56%9.68%10.40%14.20%-10.63%34.84%1.19%26.68%-13.00%19.23%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
24.15%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%

Correlation

The correlation between FASEX and HAMVX is 0.87, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.87

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2002

0.95

The correlation between FASEX and HAMVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.87 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FASEX vs. HAMVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FASEX
FASEX Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
FASEX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FASEX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FASEX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FASEX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FASEX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) and Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASEXHAMVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.53

-0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.62

5.68

-2.06

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.59

21.30

-7.71

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASEX Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is lower than the HAMVX Sharpe Ratio of 2.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASEX and HAMVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASEX drawdown since its inception was -55.57%, smaller than the maximum HAMVX drawdown of -64.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASEX and HAMVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASEXHAMVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.57%

-64.17%

+8.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.37%

-6.84%

-0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.26%

-21.04%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.26%

-21.04%

-1.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.56%

-51.44%

+6.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.61%

-0.93%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.90%

-9.92%

+1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.82%

+0.17%

Volatility

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund (FASEX) has a higher volatility of 3.53% compared to Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) at 2.94%. This indicates that FASEX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASEXHAMVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.53%

2.94%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.40%

8.88%

+1.52%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.88%

13.06%

+0.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.95%

18.60%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.14%

21.80%

-1.66%

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASEX has a 1.16% expense ratio, which is higher than HAMVX's 0.85% expense ratio.


Dividends

FASEX vs. HAMVX - Dividend Comparison

FASEX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.27%, more than HAMVX's 6.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FASEX
Nuveen Mid Cap Value Fund
12.27%14.67%5.29%3.12%6.32%4.02%1.06%0.89%4.48%7.93%3.67%3.49%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
6.98%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


FASEX and HAMVX have a correlation of 0.87, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FASEX has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to HAMVX (2.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASEX dropped -55.57% vs HAMVX's -64.17%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.98 vs 1.93), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FASEX and HAMVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer