PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
HAMVX vs. FDEGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, HAMVX achieves a 16.65% return, which is significantly higher than FDEGX's 11.92% return. Over the past 10 years, HAMVX has underperformed FDEGX with an annualized return of 10.55%, while FDEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.30% annualized return.


HAMVX

1D
0.47%
1M
3.32%
YTD
16.65%
6M
17.88%
1Y
35.32%
3Y*
20.77%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
10.55%

FDEGX

1D
0.79%
1M
5.73%
YTD
11.92%
6M
1.57%
1Y
5.92%
3Y*
17.44%
5Y*
8.88%
10Y*
12.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
16.65%16.00%12.10%16.42%-5.63%29.93%-3.77%22.93%-17.82%12.01%
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
11.92%2.88%26.57%20.93%-26.50%21.30%29.34%36.59%-6.92%21.03%

Correlation

The correlation between HAMVX and FDEGX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.64

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 5, 2002

0.80

The correlation between HAMVX and FDEGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.64 (1 year) to 0.80 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

HAMVX vs. FDEGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

HAMVX
HAMVX Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
HAMVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HAMVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
HAMVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
HAMVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
HAMVX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

FDEGX
FDEGX Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
FDEGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDEGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDEGX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
FDEGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDEGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) and Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


HAMVXFDEGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.75

0.32

+2.43

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.97

0.56

+3.41

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.07

+0.41

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.41

0.34

+5.07

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

19.16

0.87

+18.29

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current HAMVX Sharpe Ratio is 2.75, which is higher than the FDEGX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of HAMVX and FDEGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


HAMVXFDEGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.75

0.32

+2.43

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

0.38

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.56

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

0.40

0.00

Drawdowns

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum HAMVX drawdown since its inception was -64.17%, smaller than the maximum FDEGX drawdown of -85.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for HAMVX and FDEGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


HAMVXFDEGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.17%

-85.96%

+21.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

-20.45%

+13.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.04%

-26.04%

+5.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.04%

-36.62%

+15.58%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-51.44%

-36.62%

-14.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-4.01%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-36.83%

+26.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

7.99%

-6.06%

Volatility

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund (HAMVX) is 3.24%, while Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund (FDEGX) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that HAMVX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FDEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


HAMVXFDEGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.24%

6.03%

-2.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.24%

18.87%

-9.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.45%

21.95%

-8.50%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.83%

23.31%

-4.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.90%

22.04%

-0.14%

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

HAMVX has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than FDEGX's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

HAMVX vs. FDEGX - Dividend Comparison

HAMVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.43%, while FDEGX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDEGX
Fidelity Growth Strategies Fund
0.00%0.00%7.89%0.05%0.00%14.15%8.37%3.65%0.75%0.05%0.59%0.13%
HAMVX
Harbor Mid Cap Value Fund
7.43%8.67%5.77%7.20%8.24%1.27%2.35%3.10%8.41%3.84%3.06%3.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


HAMVX and FDEGX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FDEGX has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to HAMVX (3.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, HAMVX dropped -64.17% vs FDEGX's -85.96%.

HAMVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.75 vs 0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for HAMVX and FDEGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer