FASDX vs. RPFCX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FASDX (Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A) and RPFCX (Davis Appreciation & Income Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, FASDX returned 9.26%/yr vs 10.76%/yr for RPFCX. Their correlation of 0.85 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FASDX charges 0.97%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for RPFCX.

Performance

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FASDX achieves a 13.73% return, which is significantly lower than RPFCX's 14.53% return. Over the past 10 years, FASDX has underperformed RPFCX with an annualized return of 9.26%, while RPFCX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.76% annualized return.

FASDX

• 1D: -0.10%
• 1M: -0.13%
• 6M: 9.22%
• YTD: 13.73%
• 1Y: 21.66%
• 3Y*: 13.60%
• 5Y*: 7.99%
• 10Y*: 9.26%
• ALL TIME*: 8.15%

RPFCX

• 1D: 0.32%
• 1M: 1.95%
• 6M: 10.94%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 1Y: 29.41%
• 3Y*: 16.81%
• 5Y*: 10.16%
• 10Y*: 10.76%
• ALL TIME*: 8.49%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A	13.73%	12.72%	11.19%	9.15%	-10.11%	18.65%	11.00%	22.17%	-4.70%	11.05%
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	14.53%	20.90%	9.10%	23.00%	-15.65%	25.74%	4.74%	20.33%	-8.02%	16.35%

Correlation

The correlation between FASDX and RPFCX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.81
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2003	0.85

The correlation between FASDX and RPFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FASDX vs. RPFCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FASDX

FASDX Risk / Return Rank: 92
FASDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
FASDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
FASDX Omega Ratio Rank: 90
FASDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FASDX Martin Ratio Rank: 94

RPFCX

RPFCX Risk / Return Rank: 96
RPFCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
RPFCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
RPFCX Omega Ratio Rank: 95
RPFCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
RPFCX Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) and Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FASDX	RPFCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.52	3.14	-0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.56	4.50	-0.94
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.57	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.62	4.19	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.31	16.74	-1.43

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FASDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.52, which is comparable to the RPFCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FASDX and RPFCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FASDX drawdown since its inception was -59.09%, roughly equal to the maximum RPFCX drawdown of -56.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FASDX and RPFCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FASDX	RPFCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-59.09%	-56.39%	-2.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.81%	-6.76%	+0.95%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.62%	-14.82%	+2.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-17.27%	-25.63%	+8.36%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.01%	-30.72%	+0.71%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.56%	-0.08%	-0.48%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-6.46%	-7.39%	+0.93%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.37%	1.69%	-0.32%

Volatility

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A (FASDX) is 1.84%, while Davis Appreciation & Income Fund (RPFCX) has a volatility of 2.01%. This indicates that FASDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RPFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FASDX	RPFCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.84%	2.01%	-0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.52%	6.72%	-0.20%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.37%	9.06%	-0.69%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.94%	14.04%	-3.10%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.39%	14.75%	-2.36%

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FASDX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is lower than RPFCX's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FASDX vs. RPFCX - Dividend Comparison

FASDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.73%, more than RPFCX's 5.65% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASDX Fidelity Advisor Strategic Dividend & Income Fund Class A	6.73%	7.75%	5.04%	5.48%	3.98%	8.22%	5.45%	6.46%	7.92%	6.39%	4.68%	6.13%
RPFCX Davis Appreciation & Income Fund	5.65%	6.09%	1.11%	2.91%	2.63%	0.28%	0.78%	2.03%	1.09%	0.83%	1.09%	1.19%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FASDX and RPFCX in my portfolio?

FASDX and RPFCX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FASDX or RPFCX?

RPFCX has higher volatility (2.01%) compared to FASDX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FASDX dropped -59.09% vs RPFCX's -56.39%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RPFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.