FAS vs. SPXL
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and SPXL (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while SPXL tracks the S&P 500. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 22.50%/yr vs 30.27%/yr for SPXL. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.84%/yr for SPXL.
Performance
FAS vs. SPXL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPXL's 17.21% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed SPXL with an annualized return of 22.50%, while SPXL has yielded a comparatively higher 30.27% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
SPXL
- 1D
- -4.48%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- 17.21%
- 6M
- 13.86%
- 1Y
- 62.56%
- 3Y*
- 46.39%
- 5Y*
- 20.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.27%
FAS vs. SPXL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -10.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 17.21% | 31.94% | 63.61% | 69.49% | -56.55% | 98.75% | 9.64% | 102.80% | -25.11% | 71.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and SPXL is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 19, 2008 | 0.83 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and SPXL has dropped to 0.57 - well below their long-term average of 0.83, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FAS vs. SPXL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
SPXL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAS
SPXL
Technology
FAS
SPXL
Industrials
FAS
SPXL
Basic Materials
FAS
-
SPXL
Communication Services
FAS
-
SPXL
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
SPXL
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
SPXL
Energy
FAS
-
SPXL
Healthcare
FAS
-
SPXL
Real Estate
FAS
-
SPXL
Utilities
FAS
-
SPXL
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. SPXL — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
SPXL
FAS vs. SPXL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.28 | -0.23 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.35 | -2.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 9.57 | -9.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. SPXL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than SPXL's maximum drawdown of -76.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and SPXL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -76.86% | -14.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -26.77% | -14.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -48.95% | +5.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -63.80% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -76.86% | -9.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.88% | -10.44% | -7.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.10% | -16.09% | -15.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.17% | 6.56% | +11.61% |
Volatility
FAS vs. SPXL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) is 12.26%, while Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF (SPXL) has a volatility of 14.70%. This indicates that FAS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPXL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | SPXL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.26% | 14.70% | -2.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.44% | 29.55% | +3.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.36% | 37.43% | +5.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.35% | 50.54% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.18% | 53.47% | +7.71% |
FAS vs. SPXL - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXL's 0.84% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. SPXL - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than SPXL's 0.57% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.32% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% |
SPXL Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 3X ETF | 0.57% | 0.69% | 0.74% | 0.98% | 0.32% | 0.11% | 0.22% | 0.84% | 1.02% | 3.88% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and SPXL have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SPXL has higher volatility (14.70%) compared to FAS (12.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs SPXL's -76.86%.
On 10-year performance, SPXL leads with 30.27% vs 22.50% for FAS. On fees, SPXL is cheaper at 0.84% per year. On volatility, FAS has been the lower-risk option at 12.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPXL has performed better with a 30.27% return vs 22.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPXL is cheaper with a 0.84% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 0.57% for SPXL.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while SPXL tracks S&P 500. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.84% for SPXL.
SPXL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and SPXL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer