PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAS vs. SPUU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAS vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 22.50%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.81% annualized return.


FAS

1D
0.67%
1M
11.10%
YTD
-10.50%
6M
-13.84%
1Y
5.47%
3Y*
41.93%
5Y*
9.82%
10Y*
22.50%

SPUU

1D
-2.91%
1M
-3.20%
YTD
13.33%
6M
10.95%
1Y
43.00%
3Y*
34.33%
5Y*
18.44%
10Y*
24.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAS vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
-10.50%21.48%84.47%14.92%-43.19%116.59%-34.97%113.04%-33.84%67.37%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
13.33%26.55%44.25%47.28%-38.72%61.27%21.85%66.84%-14.59%44.33%

Correlation

The correlation between FAS and SPUU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014

0.77

Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and SPUU has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FAS vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FAS
SPUU

Financial Services

98.0%
11.1%

Technology

1.8%
39.0%

Industrials

0.2%
7.8%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.5%

Energy

-

3.1%

Healthcare

-

8.3%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Utilities

-

2.1%

Financial Services

FAS
98.0%
SPUU
11.1%

Technology

FAS
1.8%
SPUU
39.0%

Industrials

FAS
0.2%
SPUU
7.8%

Basic Materials

FAS

-

SPUU
1.7%

Communication Services

FAS

-

SPUU
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

FAS

-

SPUU
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

FAS

-

SPUU
4.5%

Energy

FAS

-

SPUU
3.1%

Healthcare

FAS

-

SPUU
8.3%

Real Estate

FAS

-

SPUU
1.8%

Utilities

FAS

-

SPUU
2.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAS vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAS
FAS Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
FAS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAS Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
FAS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAS Martin Ratio Rank: 1010
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUU
SPUU Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
SPUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUU Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUU Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAS vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FASSPUUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.30

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.13

2.38

-2.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.30

10.11

-9.80

FAS vs. SPUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAS Sharpe Ratio is 0.13, which is lower than the SPUU Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAS and SPUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FAS vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and SPUU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FASSPUUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.61%

-59.35%

-32.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.88%

-18.19%

-22.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.10%

-35.18%

-7.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-66.88%

-46.59%

-20.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-85.99%

-59.35%

-26.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.88%

-6.62%

-11.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-31.10%

-9.48%

-21.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.17%

4.27%

+13.90%

Volatility

FAS vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison

Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a higher volatility of 12.26% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 9.70%. This indicates that FAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FASSPUUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.26%

9.70%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

33.44%

19.93%

+13.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

43.36%

25.22%

+18.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

55.35%

33.67%

+21.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

61.18%

35.81%

+25.37%

FAS vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAS vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison

FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than SPUU's 1.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FAS
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares
9.32%8.21%0.76%1.77%0.91%0.60%0.47%0.62%1.43%0.11%0.00%0.00%
SPUU
Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF
1.42%1.63%0.55%0.83%0.88%3.04%8.03%1.80%5.50%6.96%8.08%4.42%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAS and SPUU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FAS has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to SPUU (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs SPUU's -59.35%.

On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.81% vs 22.50% for FAS. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 22.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.

FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.42% for SPUU.

FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.60% for SPUU.

SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAS and SPUU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer