FAS vs. SPUU
FAS (Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares) and SPUU (Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - FAS tracks the Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%) while SPUU tracks the S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAS returned 22.50%/yr vs 24.81%/yr for SPUU. A 0.77 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for SPUU.
Performance
FAS vs. SPUU - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAS achieves a -10.50% return, which is significantly lower than SPUU's 13.33% return. Over the past 10 years, FAS has underperformed SPUU with an annualized return of 22.50%, while SPUU has yielded a comparatively higher 24.81% annualized return.
FAS
- 1D
- 0.67%
- 1M
- 11.10%
- YTD
- -10.50%
- 6M
- -13.84%
- 1Y
- 5.47%
- 3Y*
- 41.93%
- 5Y*
- 9.82%
- 10Y*
- 22.50%
SPUU
- 1D
- -2.91%
- 1M
- -3.20%
- YTD
- 13.33%
- 6M
- 10.95%
- 1Y
- 43.00%
- 3Y*
- 34.33%
- 5Y*
- 18.44%
- 10Y*
- 24.81%
FAS vs. SPUU - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | -10.50% | 21.48% | 84.47% | 14.92% | -43.19% | 116.59% | -34.97% | 113.04% | -33.84% | 67.37% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 13.33% | 26.55% | 44.25% | 47.28% | -38.72% | 61.27% | 21.85% | 66.84% | -14.59% | 44.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAS and SPUU is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2014 | 0.77 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAS and SPUU has dropped to 0.56 - well below their long-term average of 0.77, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
FAS vs. SPUU - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAS
SPUU
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
FAS
SPUU
Technology
FAS
SPUU
Industrials
FAS
SPUU
Basic Materials
FAS
-
SPUU
Communication Services
FAS
-
SPUU
Consumer Cyclical
FAS
-
SPUU
Consumer Defensive
FAS
-
SPUU
Energy
FAS
-
SPUU
Healthcare
FAS
-
SPUU
Real Estate
FAS
-
SPUU
Utilities
FAS
-
SPUU
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAS vs. SPUU — Risk / Return Rank
FAS
SPUU
FAS vs. SPUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) and Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAS | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.78 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.30 | -0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.38 | -2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.30 | 10.11 | -9.80 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAS vs. SPUU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAS drawdown since its inception was -91.61%, which is greater than SPUU's maximum drawdown of -59.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAS and SPUU.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAS | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.61% | -59.35% | -32.26% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.88% | -18.19% | -22.69% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -43.10% | -35.18% | -7.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -66.88% | -46.59% | -20.29% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -85.99% | -59.35% | -26.64% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.88% | -6.62% | -11.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -31.10% | -9.48% | -21.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.17% | 4.27% | +13.90% |
Volatility
FAS vs. SPUU - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares (FAS) has a higher volatility of 12.26% compared to Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF (SPUU) at 9.70%. This indicates that FAS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAS | SPUU | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.26% | 9.70% | +2.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.44% | 19.93% | +13.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 43.36% | 25.22% | +18.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 55.35% | 33.67% | +21.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 61.18% | 35.81% | +25.37% |
FAS vs. SPUU - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUU's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAS vs. SPUU - Dividend Comparison
FAS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.32%, more than SPUU's 1.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAS Direxion Daily Financial Bull 3X Shares | 9.32% | 8.21% | 0.76% | 1.77% | 0.91% | 0.60% | 0.47% | 0.62% | 1.43% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPUU Direxion Daily S&P 500 Bull 2X ETF | 1.42% | 1.63% | 0.55% | 0.83% | 0.88% | 3.04% | 8.03% | 1.80% | 5.50% | 6.96% | 8.08% | 4.42% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAS and SPUU have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAS has higher volatility (12.26%) compared to SPUU (9.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAS dropped -91.61% vs SPUU's -59.35%.
On 10-year performance, SPUU leads with 24.81% vs 22.50% for FAS. On fees, SPUU is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, SPUU has been the lower-risk option at 9.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, SPUU has performed better with a 24.81% return vs 22.50%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SPUU is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FAS.
FAS has the higher dividend yield at 9.32%, compared with 1.42% for SPUU.
FAS tracks Russell 1000 Financial Services Index (300%), while SPUU tracks S&P 500 Index (200% Daily). Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FAS and 0.60% for SPUU.
SPUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAS and SPUU
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer