FAPR vs. ZJAN

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FAPR (FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April) and ZJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January) are both Defined Outcome funds. FAPR is passively managed, while ZJAN is actively managed. Over the past year, FAPR returned 12.66% vs 7.49% for ZJAN. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAPR charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZJAN.

Performance

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAPR achieves a 5.18% return, which is significantly higher than ZJAN's 2.27% return.

FAPR

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.57%
• YTD: 5.18%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 12.66%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 8.95%
• 10Y*: —

ZJAN

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.27%
• 6M: 2.87%
• 1Y: 7.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
FAPR FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April	5.18%	7.59%
ZJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January	2.27%	6.79%

Correlation

The correlation between FAPR and ZJAN is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025	0.83

The correlation between FAPR and ZJAN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAPR vs. ZJAN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAPR

FAPR Risk / Return Rank: 96
FAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
FAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
FAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
FAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
FAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 97

ZJAN

ZJAN Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
ZJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAPR	ZJAN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.37	3.70	-0.34
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	5.48	5.70	-0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.75	1.83	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	11.10	5.52	+5.58
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	48.99	28.73	+20.26
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAPR Sharpe Ratio is 3.37, which is comparable to the ZJAN Sharpe Ratio of 3.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAPR and ZJAN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAPR	ZJAN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.37	3.70	-0.34
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.87	2.18	-1.31

Drawdowns

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAPR drawdown since its inception was -15.96%, which is greater than ZJAN's maximum drawdown of -3.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAPR and ZJAN.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAPR	ZJAN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.96%	-3.20%	-12.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.15%	-1.36%	+0.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.64%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.96%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-0.05%	-0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.71%	-0.35%	-2.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.26%	0.26%	0.00%

Volatility

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - April (FAPR) has a higher volatility of 1.43% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr January (ZJAN) at 0.39%. This indicates that FAPR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZJAN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAPR	ZJAN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.43%	0.39%	+1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.83%	1.45%	+1.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	2.04%	+1.75%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.49%	2.97%	+7.52%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	2.97%	+7.46%

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAPR has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than ZJAN's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAPR vs. ZJAN - Dividend Comparison

Neither FAPR nor ZJAN has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAPR and ZJAN in my portfolio?

FAPR and ZJAN have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAPR or ZJAN?

FAPR has higher volatility (1.43%) compared to ZJAN (0.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAPR dropped -15.96% vs ZJAN's -3.20%.

Which ETF is better, FAPR or ZJAN?

On 1-year performance, FAPR leads with 12.66% vs 7.49% for ZJAN. On fees, ZJAN is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, ZJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAPR or ZJAN?

Over the 1-year period, FAPR has performed better with a 12.66% return vs 7.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAPR or ZJAN?

ZJAN is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for FAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAPR or ZJAN?

FAPR and ZJAN have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between FAPR and ZJAN?

They also come from different issuers: FT Vest and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for FAPR and 0.79% for ZJAN.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.70 vs 3.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.