FAOCX vs. APHKX
FAOCX (Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C) and APHKX (Artisan International Value Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAOCX returned 6.48%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for APHKX. Their correlation of 0.87 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAOCX charges 2.25%/yr vs 0.97%/yr for APHKX.
Performance
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
Over the past 10 years, FAOCX has underperformed APHKX with an annualized return of 6.48%, while APHKX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.
FAOCX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- YTD
- 0.00%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- -1.01%
- 3Y*
- 6.99%
- 5Y*
- 2.79%
- 10Y*
- 6.48%
APHKX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- 2.41%
- YTD
- 10.82%
- 6M
- 11.16%
- 1Y
- 23.99%
- 3Y*
- 16.56%
- 5Y*
- 11.05%
- 10Y*
- 11.60%
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C | 0.00% | 14.19% | 3.86% | 19.03% | -25.22% | 17.97% | 13.77% | 26.37% | -15.77% | 28.58% |
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 10.82% | 22.84% | 6.64% | 22.95% | -6.78% | 16.94% | 8.81% | 24.22% | -15.48% | 24.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAOCX and APHKX is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2006 | 0.87 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAOCX and APHKX has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAOCX vs. APHKX — Risk / Return Rank
FAOCX
APHKX
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) and Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAOCX | APHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.88 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.68 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.36 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.13 | 2.47 | -2.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.21 | 8.34 | -8.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAOCX drawdown since its inception was -60.45%, which is greater than APHKX's maximum drawdown of -56.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAOCX and APHKX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAOCX | APHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.45% | -56.33% | -4.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.33% | -9.96% | +2.63% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.05% | -10.87% | -3.18% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -36.96% | -24.83% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.96% | -38.07% | +1.11% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.90% | -0.67% | -5.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -15.61% | -9.08% | -6.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.17% | 2.93% | +1.24% |
Volatility
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C (FAOCX) is 0.00%, while Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) has a volatility of 3.94%. This indicates that FAOCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APHKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAOCX | APHKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.00% | 3.94% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.64% | 10.05% | -6.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.76% | 13.92% | -5.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.71% | 13.99% | +2.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.64% | 16.13% | +0.51% |
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAOCX has a 2.25% expense ratio, which is higher than APHKX's 0.97% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAOCX vs. APHKX - Dividend Comparison
FAOCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than APHKX's 6.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 6.44% | 7.10% | 4.34% | 3.10% | 2.28% | 10.00% | 0.98% | 3.92% | 5.69% | 4.15% | 3.31% | 6.40% |
FAOCX Fidelity Advisor Overseas Fund Class C | 8.26% | 8.26% | 0.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.22% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 3.72% | 3.07% | 0.12% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAOCX and APHKX have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APHKX has higher volatility (3.94%) compared to FAOCX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAOCX dropped -60.45% vs APHKX's -56.33%.
APHKX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs -0.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAOCX and APHKX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer