APHKX vs. GVAL
APHKX (Artisan International Value Fund) and GVAL (Cambria Global Value ETF) are both funds - APHKX is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Artisan, while GVAL is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Cambria. Both are actively managed. Over the past 10 years, APHKX returned 11.03%/yr vs 12.03%/yr for GVAL. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. APHKX charges 0.97%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for GVAL.
Performance
APHKX vs. GVAL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, APHKX achieves a 11.33% return, which is significantly lower than GVAL's 19.68% return. Over the past 10 years, APHKX has underperformed GVAL with an annualized return of 11.03%, while GVAL has yielded a comparatively higher 12.03% annualized return.
APHKX
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 2.87%
- YTD
- 11.33%
- 6M
- 11.98%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 16.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.31%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
GVAL
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 6.30%
- YTD
- 19.68%
- 6M
- 19.91%
- 1Y
- 46.46%
- 3Y*
- 28.26%
- 5Y*
- 14.84%
- 10Y*
- 12.03%
APHKX vs. GVAL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 11.33% | 22.84% | 6.64% | 22.95% | -6.78% | 16.94% | 8.81% | 24.22% | -15.48% | 24.09% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 19.68% | 55.87% | 2.59% | 13.30% | -7.98% | 10.70% | -8.51% | 17.24% | -14.30% | 29.50% |
Correlation
The correlation between APHKX and GVAL is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2014 | 0.73 |
The correlation between APHKX and GVAL shifts across timeframes, from 0.62 (1 year) to 0.73 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
APHKX vs. GVAL — Risk / Return Rank
APHKX
GVAL
APHKX vs. GVAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) and Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| APHKX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.54 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.50 | 4.06 | -1.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.45 | 15.49 | -7.03 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
APHKX vs. GVAL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum APHKX drawdown since its inception was -56.33%, which is greater than GVAL's maximum drawdown of -46.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for APHKX and GVAL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| APHKX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.33% | -46.82% | -9.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.96% | -11.50% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.87% | -15.72% | +4.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.83% | -30.83% | +6.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.07% | -46.82% | +8.75% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.22% | -0.41% | +0.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.08% | -13.83% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | 3.01% | -0.08% |
Volatility
APHKX vs. GVAL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Artisan International Value Fund (APHKX) is 3.97%, while Cambria Global Value ETF (GVAL) has a volatility of 6.03%. This indicates that APHKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GVAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| APHKX | GVAL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.97% | 6.03% | -2.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.03% | 13.65% | -3.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.88% | 15.45% | -1.57% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.99% | 18.58% | -4.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.15% | 19.19% | -3.04% |
APHKX vs. GVAL - Expense Ratio Comparison
APHKX has a 0.97% expense ratio, which is higher than GVAL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
APHKX vs. GVAL - Dividend Comparison
APHKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.41%, more than GVAL's 2.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APHKX Artisan International Value Fund | 6.41% | 7.10% | 4.34% | 3.10% | 2.28% | 10.00% | 0.98% | 3.92% | 5.69% | 4.15% | 3.31% | 6.40% |
GVAL Cambria Global Value ETF | 2.39% | 2.93% | 4.75% | 6.12% | 5.05% | 2.97% | 1.90% | 2.84% | 4.65% | 2.00% | 2.54% | 2.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
APHKX and GVAL have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
GVAL has higher volatility (6.03%) compared to APHKX (3.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, APHKX dropped -56.33% vs GVAL's -46.82%.
GVAL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for APHKX and GVAL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer