FAN vs. ROBT
FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) and ROBT (First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while ROBT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, FAN returned 4.21%/yr vs -0.08%/yr for ROBT. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FAN charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for ROBT.
Performance
FAN vs. ROBT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 20.47% return, which is significantly higher than ROBT's 3.51% return.
FAN
- 1D
- -2.65%
- 1M
- -5.81%
- YTD
- 20.47%
- 6M
- 20.15%
- 1Y
- 38.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.67%
- 5Y*
- 4.21%
- 10Y*
- 9.88%
ROBT
- 1D
- -2.40%
- 1M
- -3.90%
- YTD
- 3.51%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 17.15%
- 3Y*
- 6.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.08%
- 10Y*
- —
FAN vs. ROBT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 20.47% | 40.38% | -8.96% | -3.20% | -13.12% | -11.63% | 61.16% | 31.22% | -10.52% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 3.51% | 15.16% | -0.41% | 27.77% | -34.94% | 9.91% | 46.18% | 34.28% | -14.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAN and ROBT is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2018 | 0.65 |
The correlation between FAN and ROBT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
FAN vs. ROBT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FAN
ROBT
Utilities
-
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
FAN
ROBT
-
Industrials
FAN
ROBT
Consumer Cyclical
FAN
ROBT
Energy
FAN
ROBT
Basic Materials
FAN
ROBT
-
Communication Services
FAN
-
ROBT
Consumer Defensive
FAN
-
ROBT
Financial Services
FAN
-
ROBT
Healthcare
FAN
-
ROBT
Real Estate
FAN
-
ROBT
-
Technology
FAN
-
ROBT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAN vs. ROBT — Risk / Return Rank
FAN
ROBT
FAN vs. ROBT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.48 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.13 | +0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.51 | 0.80 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.64 | 2.22 | +9.42 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAN vs. ROBT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than ROBT's maximum drawdown of -44.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and ROBT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.94% | -44.47% | -35.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.13% | -21.66% | +10.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.46% | -27.68% | +3.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.45% | -43.26% | +4.81% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.44% | -10.93% | +1.49% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.08% | -15.91% | -29.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.35% | 7.75% | -4.40% |
Volatility
FAN vs. ROBT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) is 6.87%, while First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF (ROBT) has a volatility of 10.81%. This indicates that FAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ROBT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAN | ROBT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.87% | 10.81% | -3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.93% | 19.33% | -3.40% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.41% | 24.76% | -4.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.42% | 25.49% | -4.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.96% | 25.59% | -4.63% |
FAN vs. ROBT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is lower than ROBT's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAN vs. ROBT - Dividend Comparison
FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.03%, while ROBT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF | 1.03% | 1.35% | 1.52% | 1.71% | 1.50% | 1.79% | 0.84% | 2.42% | 2.67% | 2.59% | 6.04% | 2.35% |
ROBT First Trust Nasdaq Artificial Intelligence & Robotics ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.68% | 0.23% | 0.35% | 0.06% | 0.17% | 0.42% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAN and ROBT have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ROBT has higher volatility (10.81%) compared to FAN (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAN dropped -79.94% vs ROBT's -44.47%.
On 5-year performance, FAN leads with 4.21% vs -0.08% for ROBT. On fees, FAN is cheaper at 0.62% per year. On volatility, FAN has been the lower-risk option at 6.87%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, FAN has performed better with a 4.21% return vs -0.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FAN is cheaper with a 0.62% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for ROBT.
FAN has the higher dividend yield at 1.03%, compared with 0.00% for ROBT.
FAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while ROBT is Technology Equities. FAN tracks ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while ROBT tracks Nasdaq CTA Artificial Intelligence and Robotics Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FAN and 0.65% for ROBT.
FAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAN and ROBT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer