FAN vs. RDVY

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FAN (First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF) and RDVY (First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while RDVY is a Dividend fund tracking the Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FAN returned 8.65%/yr vs 16.25%/yr for RDVY. Their 0.56 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FAN charges 0.62%/yr vs 0.47%/yr for RDVY.

Performance

FAN vs. RDVY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAN achieves a 16.34% return, which is significantly lower than RDVY's 17.25% return. Over the past 10 years, FAN has underperformed RDVY with an annualized return of 8.65%, while RDVY has yielded a comparatively higher 16.25% annualized return.

FAN

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: -4.47%
• 6M: 5.73%
• YTD: 16.34%
• 1Y: 27.30%
• 3Y*: 13.47%
• 5Y*: 3.65%
• 10Y*: 8.65%
• ALL TIME*: 0.76%

RDVY

• 1D: 0.36%
• 1M: 1.19%
• 6M: 12.71%
• YTD: 17.25%
• 1Y: 30.74%
• 3Y*: 19.76%
• 5Y*: 12.89%
• 10Y*: 16.25%
• ALL TIME*: 13.76%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	$1.50M	$1.70M	$2.53M
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	$77.65M	$79.19M	$83.63M

FAN vs. RDVY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	16.34%	40.38%	-8.96%	-3.20%	-13.12%	-11.63%	61.16%	31.22%	-11.40%	16.30%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	17.25%	18.90%	16.41%	20.38%	-13.27%	31.14%	13.47%	37.71%	-9.92%	22.75%

Correlation

The correlation between FAN and RDVY is 0.51, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.51
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.56
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.58
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.55
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 7, 2014	0.56

The correlation between FAN and RDVY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.58 - a consistent structural relationship.

FAN vs. RDVY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FAN	RDVY
Utilities	53.9%	1.4%
Industrials	43.3%	12.5%
Consumer Cyclical	1.6%	11.1%
Energy	0.9%	2.8%
Basic Materials	0.2%	-
Communication Services	-	4.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.8%
Financial Services	-	38.9%
Healthcare	-	5.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	19.4%

Return for Risk

FAN vs. RDVY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FAN

FAN Risk / Return Rank: 52
FAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
FAN Omega Ratio Rank: 52
FAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
FAN Martin Ratio Rank: 50

RDVY

RDVY Risk / Return Rank: 85
RDVY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
RDVY Omega Ratio Rank: 82
RDVY Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
RDVY Martin Ratio Rank: 89

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FAN vs. RDVY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) and First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FAN	RDVY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.32	2.00	-0.68
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.88	2.87	-0.99
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.35	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.86	3.25	-1.39
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.79	13.63	-7.85

FAN vs. RDVY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAN Sharpe Ratio is 1.32, which is lower than the RDVY Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAN and RDVY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FAN vs. RDVY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAN drawdown since its inception was -79.94%, which is greater than RDVY's maximum drawdown of -40.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAN and RDVY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAN	RDVY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-79.94%	-40.60%	-39.34%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.64%	-9.04%	-5.60%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.13%	-19.11%	-5.02%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.45%	-25.32%	-13.13%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.29%	-40.60%	-5.69%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-12.54%	0.00%	-12.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.87%	-4.95%	-39.92%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.69%	2.15%	+2.54%

Volatility

FAN vs. RDVY - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF (FAN) has a higher volatility of 5.47% compared to First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF (RDVY) at 3.53%. This indicates that FAN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RDVY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAN	RDVY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.47%	3.53%	+1.94%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.12%	11.46%	+4.66%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	14.65%	+5.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.38%	18.92%	+2.46%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.96%	21.03%	-0.07%

FAN vs. RDVY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAN has a 0.62% expense ratio, which is higher than RDVY's 0.47% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAN vs. RDVY - Dividend Comparison

FAN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than RDVY's 0.83% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FAN First Trust Global Wind Energy ETF	0.99%	1.35%	1.52%	1.71%	1.50%	1.79%	0.84%	2.42%	2.67%	2.59%	6.04%	2.35%
RDVY First Trust Rising Dividend Achievers ETF	0.83%	1.11%	1.64%	2.09%	2.21%	1.04%	1.53%	1.55%	1.68%	1.25%	2.07%	2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAN and RDVY in my portfolio?

FAN and RDVY have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAN or RDVY?

FAN has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to RDVY (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAN dropped -79.94% vs RDVY's -40.60%.

Which ETF is better, FAN or RDVY?

On 10-year performance, RDVY leads with 16.25% vs 8.65% for FAN. On fees, RDVY is cheaper at 0.47% per year. On volatility, RDVY has been the lower-risk option at 3.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAN or RDVY?

Over the 10-year period, RDVY has performed better with a 16.25% return vs 8.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAN or RDVY?

RDVY is cheaper with a 0.47% expense ratio, compared with 0.62% for FAN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAN or RDVY?

FAN has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.83% for RDVY.

What is the main difference between FAN and RDVY?

FAN is categorized as Alternative Energy Equities, while RDVY is Dividend. FAN tracks ISE Clean Edge Global Wind Energy Index, while RDVY tracks Nasdaq US Rising Dividend Achievers Index. Their fees differ too: 0.62% for FAN and 0.47% for RDVY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RDVY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.