FAMKX vs. FSPSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX).
FAMKX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Mar 29, 2004. FSPSX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI ex USA IMI Index. It was launched on Nov 5, 1997.
Performance
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 0.85% | 39.76% | 9.01% | 8.12% | -20.09% | -2.90% | 30.05% | 29.29% | -18.32% | 46.52% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 0.95% | 31.98% | 3.70% | 18.31% | -14.23% | 11.45% | 8.16% | 22.03% | -13.55% | 25.37% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 0.85% return, which is significantly lower than FSPSX's 0.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has outperformed FSPSX with an annualized return of 10.07%, while FSPSX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.97% annualized return.
FAMKX
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -13.15%
- YTD
- 0.85%
- 6M
- 6.45%
- 1Y
- 32.95%
- 3Y*
- 17.10%
- 5Y*
- 4.48%
- 10Y*
- 10.07%
FSPSX
- 1D
- 2.95%
- 1M
- -6.35%
- YTD
- 0.95%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- 1Y
- 22.97%
- 3Y*
- 14.61%
- 5Y*
- 8.36%
- 10Y*
- 8.97%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is higher than FSPSX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FAMKX vs. FSPSX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMKX
FSPSX
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAMKX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.74 | 1.39 | +0.35 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.22 | 1.90 | +0.31 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.28 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.13 | 1.94 | +0.19 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.25 | 7.43 | +0.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAMKX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.74 | 1.39 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 | 0.53 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.55 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.39 | 0.47 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMKX and FSPSX is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Dividend Comparison
FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, less than FSPSX's 3.12% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMKX Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A | 1.32% | 1.33% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.76% | 4.87% | 1.84% | 10.64% | 0.17% | 0.10% | 0.03% | 0.00% |
FSPSX Fidelity International Index Fund | 3.12% | 3.15% | 3.27% | 2.79% | 2.66% | 3.07% | 1.84% | 3.18% | 2.79% | 2.50% | 3.08% | 2.79% |
Drawdowns
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than FSPSX's maximum drawdown of -33.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and FSPSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMKX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.11% | -33.69% | -36.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.73% | -11.39% | -2.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.76% | -29.41% | -11.35% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.16% | -33.69% | -8.47% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.73% | -8.22% | -5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -6.60% | -14.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.55% | 2.97% | +0.58% |
Volatility
FAMKX vs. FSPSX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) has a higher volatility of 8.51% compared to Fidelity International Index Fund (FSPSX) at 7.65%. This indicates that FAMKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSPSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FAMKX | FSPSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.51% | 7.65% | +0.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.09% | 11.01% | +2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.40% | 17.00% | +1.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.46% | 15.82% | +2.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.56% | 16.49% | +2.07% |