PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAMKX vs. DEMCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAMKX achieves a 33.58% return, which is significantly lower than DEMCX's 112.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMKX has underperformed DEMCX with an annualized return of 12.97%, while DEMCX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.58% annualized return.


FAMKX

1D
2.02%
1M
13.68%
YTD
33.58%
6M
37.50%
1Y
69.96%
3Y*
28.77%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
12.97%

DEMCX

1D
2.49%
1M
25.73%
YTD
112.02%
6M
129.18%
1Y
249.82%
3Y*
65.17%
5Y*
24.83%
10Y*
20.58%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
33.58%39.76%9.01%8.12%-20.09%-2.90%30.05%29.29%-18.32%46.52%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
112.02%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%

Correlation

The correlation between FAMKX and DEMCX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.66

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.74

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2004

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between FAMKX and DEMCX has dropped to 0.66 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAMKX vs. DEMCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAMKX
FAMKX Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
FAMKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAMKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAMKX Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
FAMKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAMKX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) and Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAMKXDEMCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.72

1.87

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.13

12.10

-6.97

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

20.90

45.95

-25.05

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAMKX Sharpe Ratio is 3.91, which is lower than the DEMCX Sharpe Ratio of 6.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAMKX and DEMCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAMKXDEMCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.91

6.65

-2.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

0.99

-0.49

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.69

0.89

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.49

-0.04

Drawdowns

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAMKX drawdown since its inception was -70.11%, which is greater than DEMCX's maximum drawdown of -63.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMKX and DEMCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAMKXDEMCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.11%

-63.54%

-6.57%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-13.73%

-21.11%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.84%

-23.22%

+4.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.76%

-44.75%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.16%

-47.21%

+5.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.46%

-19.63%

-0.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.36%

5.54%

-2.18%

Volatility

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A (FAMKX) is 7.88%, while Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a volatility of 17.09%. This indicates that FAMKX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DEMCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAMKXDEMCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.88%

17.09%

-9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.44%

33.83%

-18.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.00%

38.39%

-20.39%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.92%

25.33%

-6.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.82%

23.14%

-4.32%

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAMKX has a 1.32% expense ratio, which is lower than DEMCX's 2.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAMKX vs. DEMCX - Dividend Comparison

FAMKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.00%, less than DEMCX's 9.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
9.66%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%
FAMKX
Fidelity Advisor Focused Emerging Markets Fund Class A
1.00%1.33%0.74%1.25%0.76%4.87%1.84%10.64%0.17%0.10%0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAMKX and DEMCX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (17.09%) compared to FAMKX (7.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMKX dropped -70.11% vs DEMCX's -63.54%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (6.65 vs 3.91), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAMKX and DEMCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer