PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
DEMCX vs. DDVCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, DEMCX achieves a 133.75% return, which is significantly higher than DDVCX's 6.18% return. Over the past 10 years, DEMCX has outperformed DDVCX with an annualized return of 21.74%, while DDVCX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.81% annualized return.


DEMCX

1D
8.20%
1M
23.60%
YTD
133.75%
6M
150.69%
1Y
251.28%
3Y*
67.83%
5Y*
28.09%
10Y*
21.74%

DDVCX

1D
0.48%
1M
0.64%
YTD
6.18%
6M
5.73%
1Y
17.60%
3Y*
8.43%
5Y*
5.58%
10Y*
6.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
133.75%84.86%5.47%16.47%-29.38%-3.05%24.55%23.16%-17.94%40.59%
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
6.18%9.95%5.68%1.06%-4.57%20.87%-0.63%19.33%-3.92%12.51%

Correlation

The correlation between DEMCX and DDVCX is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 29, 2002

0.58

Over the past year, the correlation between DEMCX and DDVCX has dropped to 0.26 - well below their long-term average of 0.58, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

DEMCX vs. DDVCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

DEMCX
DEMCX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
DEMCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DEMCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
DEMCX Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
DEMCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
DEMCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank

DDVCX
DDVCX Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
DDVCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DDVCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
DDVCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
DDVCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
DDVCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2626
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) and Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


DEMCXDDVCXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+4.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.78

1.26

+0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

12.22

2.07

+10.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

44.57

5.83

+38.74

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current DEMCX Sharpe Ratio is 5.72, which is higher than the DDVCX Sharpe Ratio of 1.46. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of DEMCX and DDVCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum DEMCX drawdown since its inception was -63.54%, which is greater than DDVCX's maximum drawdown of -54.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for DEMCX and DDVCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


DEMCXDDVCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.54%

-54.29%

-9.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.11%

-8.59%

-12.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.22%

-18.71%

-4.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.73%

-18.71%

-25.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.21%

-37.60%

-9.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-3.70%

+3.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.60%

-9.03%

-10.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

3.03%

+2.74%

Volatility

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Volatility Comparison

Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C (DEMCX) has a higher volatility of 25.52% compared to Nomura Value Fund Class C (DDVCX) at 3.61%. This indicates that DEMCX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DDVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


DEMCXDDVCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.52%

3.61%

+21.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

41.20%

9.25%

+31.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.10%

12.15%

+32.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.51%

14.58%

+12.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.32%

17.09%

+7.23%

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

DEMCX has a 2.17% expense ratio, which is higher than DDVCX's 1.72% expense ratio.


Dividends

DEMCX vs. DDVCX - Dividend Comparison

DEMCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.76%, less than DDVCX's 24.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DDVCX
Nomura Value Fund Class C
24.81%26.55%30.88%10.78%9.46%23.96%1.92%4.13%5.29%3.08%1.57%1.97%
DEMCX
Nomura Emerging Markets Fund Class C
8.76%20.47%1.09%2.03%0.69%2.58%0.61%0.00%0.00%1.03%0.08%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


DEMCX and DDVCX have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DEMCX has higher volatility (25.52%) compared to DDVCX (3.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, DEMCX dropped -63.54% vs DDVCX's -54.29%.

DEMCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.72 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for DEMCX and DDVCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer