FAMFX vs. EMCAX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and EMCAX (Empiric 2500 Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX returned 6.92%/yr vs 10.82%/yr for EMCAX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.96%/yr for EMCAX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -1.15% return, which is significantly lower than EMCAX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed EMCAX with an annualized return of 6.92%, while EMCAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.82% annualized return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.89%
- 6M
- -6.27%
- YTD
- -1.15%
- 1Y
- -11.04%
- 3Y*
- 1.58%
- 5Y*
- 2.31%
- 10Y*
- 6.92%
EMCAX
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- -0.64%
- 6M
- 9.50%
- YTD
- 13.71%
- 1Y
- 18.61%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 4.16%
- 10Y*
- 10.82%
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -1.15% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 13.71% | 2.37% | 13.89% | 12.43% | -16.06% | 16.07% | 27.81% | 19.10% | -4.64% | 21.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and EMCAX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012 | 0.81 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FAMFX and EMCAX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.81, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. EMCAX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
EMCAX
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.90 | 1.21 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.57 | 2.02 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.02 | 7.57 | -8.59 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum EMCAX drawdown of -51.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and EMCAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -51.81% | +12.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -21.70% | -8.60% | -13.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -19.19% | -9.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -30.60% | +1.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | -42.79% | +3.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.67% | -2.34% | -17.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.06% | -13.23% | +7.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.66% | 2.30% | +10.36% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Volatility Comparison
FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to Empiric 2500 Fund (EMCAX) at 4.37%. This indicates that FAMFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EMCAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | EMCAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.08% | 4.37% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 11.73% | +1.51% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.66% | 14.66% | +3.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 18.20% | +0.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.48% | 20.16% | -0.68% |
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is lower than EMCAX's 1.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. EMCAX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.45%, more than EMCAX's 0.12% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EMCAX Empiric 2500 Fund | 0.12% | 0.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.51% | 7.46% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.45% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and EMCAX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FAMFX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to EMCAX (4.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs EMCAX's -51.81%.
EMCAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.18 vs -0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and EMCAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer