FAMFX vs. ETEGX
FAMFX (FAM Small Cap Fund) and ETEGX (Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund) are both Small Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX returned 6.76%/yr vs 9.03%/yr for ETEGX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAMFX charges 1.27%/yr vs 1.21%/yr for ETEGX.
Performance
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAMFX achieves a -6.70% return, which is significantly lower than ETEGX's 5.54% return. Over the past 10 years, FAMFX has underperformed ETEGX with an annualized return of 6.76%, while ETEGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.03% annualized return.
FAMFX
- 1D
- -1.03%
- 1M
- 0.86%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -8.44%
- 1Y
- -14.56%
- 3Y*
- 1.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.97%
- 10Y*
- 6.76%
ETEGX
- 1D
- -0.28%
- 1M
- 4.06%
- YTD
- 5.54%
- 6M
- 3.22%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.69%
- 10Y*
- 9.03%
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | -6.70% | -11.60% | 12.43% | 20.10% | -12.42% | 27.72% | 10.10% | 26.89% | -8.54% | 4.56% |
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 5.54% | -6.20% | 14.65% | 11.28% | -15.52% | 21.45% | 12.73% | 27.57% | -6.00% | 14.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAMFX and ETEGX is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.89 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 1, 2012 | 0.89 |
The correlation between FAMFX and ETEGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAMFX vs. ETEGX — Risk / Return Rank
FAMFX
ETEGX
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) and Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FAMFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.98 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.89 | 1.05 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.58 | 0.30 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.05 | 0.67 | -1.72 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAMFX drawdown since its inception was -39.66%, smaller than the maximum ETEGX drawdown of -67.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAMFX and ETEGX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAMFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -39.66% | -67.58% | +27.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.23% | -13.05% | -9.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.71% | -19.98% | -8.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.71% | -24.30% | -4.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -39.66% | -36.66% | -3.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -24.19% | -6.81% | -17.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.01% | -22.74% | +16.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.30% | 5.89% | +6.41% |
Volatility
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FAM Small Cap Fund (FAMFX) is 4.29%, while Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund (ETEGX) has a volatility of 4.54%. This indicates that FAMFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETEGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAMFX | ETEGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.29% | 4.54% | -0.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.99% | 11.40% | +1.59% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 16.28% | +1.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.76% | 18.79% | -0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 19.87% | -0.33% |
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAMFX has a 1.27% expense ratio, which is higher than ETEGX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAMFX vs. ETEGX - Dividend Comparison
FAMFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.65%, less than ETEGX's 7.80% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ETEGX Eaton Vance Small-Cap Fund | 7.80% | 8.23% | 5.13% | 0.68% | 3.22% | 13.87% | 1.06% | 7.19% | 12.29% | 11.02% | 13.88% | 23.25% |
FAMFX FAM Small Cap Fund | 3.65% | 3.41% | 4.43% | 6.44% | 0.36% | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.47% | 10.85% | 2.15% | 2.99% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAMFX and ETEGX have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ETEGX has higher volatility (4.54%) compared to FAMFX (4.29%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAMFX dropped -39.66% vs ETEGX's -67.58%.
ETEGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.24 vs -0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FAMFX and ETEGX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer