FALN vs. ESHY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FALN (iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF) and ESHY (Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds - FALN tracks the Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index while ESHY tracks the JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. Both are passively managed. FALN charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ESHY.

Performance

FALN vs. ESHY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

FALN

• 1D: -0.22%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 1.56%
• 6M: 1.36%
• 1Y: 8.66%
• 3Y*: 9.18%
• 5Y*: 3.78%
• 10Y*: —

ESHY

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FALN vs. ESHY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	0.46%
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%

FALN vs. ESHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FALN	ESHY
Real Estate	100.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	100.0%
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

FALN vs. ESHY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FALN

FALN Risk / Return Rank: 54
FALN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FALN Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
FALN Omega Ratio Rank: 60
FALN Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
FALN Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FALN vs. ESHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF (FALN) and Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF (ESHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FALN	ESHY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.91	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.78	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.20	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FALN	ESHY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.91	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.74	—	—

Drawdowns

FALN vs. ESHY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FALN drawdown since its inception was -29.22%, which is greater than ESHY's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FALN and ESHY.

Drawdown Indicators

	FALN	ESHY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.22%	0.00%	-29.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.96%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.92%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.78%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.26%	0.00%	-0.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.32%	0.00%	-3.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	FALN	ESHY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.38%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	3.64%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	4.54%	0.00%	+4.54%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.31%	0.00%	+7.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.95%	0.00%	+8.95%

FALN vs. ESHY - Expense Ratio Comparison

FALN has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than ESHY's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FALN vs. ESHY - Dividend Comparison

FALN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.46%, while ESHY has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
ESHY Xtrackers J.P. Morgan ESG USD High Yield Corporate Bond ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FALN iShares Fallen Angels USD Bond ETF	6.46%	6.31%	6.24%	5.37%	5.08%	3.40%	5.14%	5.35%	5.97%	6.98%	3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, FALN or ESHY?

On fees, ESHY is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, FALN or ESHY?

ESHY is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for FALN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FALN or ESHY?

FALN has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 0.00% for ESHY.

What is the main difference between FALN and ESHY?

FALN tracks Bloomberg US High Yield Fallen Angel 3% Capped Index, while ESHY tracks JPMorgan ESG DM Corporate High Yield USD Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for FALN and 0.20% for ESHY.