FAI vs. SGVT
FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) and SGVT (Schwab Government Money Market ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FAI is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while SGVT is a Money Market fund actively managed by Charles Schwab. FAI is passively managed, while SGVT is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.10, they often move in opposite directions. FAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.28%/yr for SGVT.
Performance
FAI vs. SGVT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 36.77% return, which is significantly higher than SGVT's 1.41% return.
FAI
- 1D
- -1.66%
- 1M
- 17.27%
- YTD
- 36.77%
- 6M
- 35.51%
- 1Y
- 72.81%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SGVT
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 1.41%
- 6M
- 1.69%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FAI vs. SGVT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 36.77% | 22.53% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 1.41% | 2.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between FAI and SGVT is -0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025 | -0.10 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FAI vs. SGVT — Risk / Return Rank
FAI
SGVT
FAI vs. SGVT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Schwab Government Money Market ETF (SGVT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FAI | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.88 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FAI | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.70 | 18.52 | -16.82 |
Drawdowns
FAI vs. SGVT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, which is greater than SGVT's maximum drawdown of -0.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and SGVT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FAI | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.82% | -0.03% | -27.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.85% | 0.00% | -2.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.30% | -0.00% | -5.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.77% | — | — |
Volatility
FAI vs. SGVT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FAI | SGVT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.57% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 19.40% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.47% | 0.20% | +24.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 0.20% | +29.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.89% | 0.20% | +29.69% |
FAI vs. SGVT - Expense Ratio Comparison
FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than SGVT's 0.28% expense ratio.
Dividends
FAI vs. SGVT - Dividend Comparison
FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SGVT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.04% |
SGVT Schwab Government Money Market ETF | 3.12% | 1.73% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FAI and SGVT have a correlation of -0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SGVT is cheaper at 0.28% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SGVT is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.
SGVT has the higher dividend yield at 3.12%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.
FAI is categorized as Technology Equities, while SGVT is Money Market. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.28% for SGVT.
Find the right allocation for FAI and SGVT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer