FAI vs. PXQ

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

FAI (First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF) and PXQ (Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - FAI tracks the Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index while PXQ tracks the STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, FAI returned 72.81% vs 92.28% for PXQ. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FAI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for PXQ.

Performance

FAI vs. PXQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 36.77% return, which is significantly lower than PXQ's 58.43% return.

FAI

• 1D: -1.66%
• 1M: 17.27%
• YTD: 36.77%
• 6M: 35.51%
• 1Y: 72.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PXQ

• 1D: -3.05%
• 1M: 18.64%
• YTD: 58.43%
• 6M: 58.28%
• 1Y: 92.28%
• 3Y*: 42.20%
• 5Y*: 20.98%
• 10Y*: 20.97%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAI vs. PXQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF	36.77%	33.37%	2.06%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	58.43%	28.65%	1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FAI and PXQ is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024	0.84

The correlation between FAI and PXQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FAI vs. PXQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAI

FAI Risk / Return Rank: 80
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 69

PXQ

PXQ Risk / Return Rank: 96
PXQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PXQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PXQ Martin Ratio Rank: 97

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAI vs. PXQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FAI	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.99	4.31	-1.32
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.58	5.27	-1.69
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.47	1.70	-0.23
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.88	9.29	-5.40
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.65	40.65	-28.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FAI vs. PXQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is lower than the PXQ Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and PXQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FAI	PXQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.99	4.31	-1.32
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.91	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.92	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.70	0.57	+1.13

Drawdowns

FAI vs. PXQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum PXQ drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and PXQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	FAI	PXQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.82%	-57.18%	+29.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-18.84%	-9.99%	-8.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-21.40%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-34.55%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.55%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.85%	-3.67%	+0.82%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.30%	-10.74%	+5.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.77%	2.28%	+3.49%

Volatility

FAI vs. PXQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) is 8.57%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (PXQ) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that FAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PXQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FAI	PXQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.57%	9.83%	-1.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	19.40%	17.46%	+1.94%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.47%	21.53%	+2.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	29.89%	23.22%	+6.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.89%	22.98%	+6.91%

FAI vs. PXQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than PXQ's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

FAI vs. PXQ - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PXQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
FAI First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.04%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PXQ Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF	0.59%	0.86%	1.38%	0.60%	2.24%	0.55%	0.18%	0.44%	1.22%	0.66%	0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FAI and PXQ in my portfolio?

FAI and PXQ have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FAI or PXQ?

PXQ has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to FAI (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs PXQ's -57.18%.

Which ETF is better, FAI or PXQ?

On 1-year performance, PXQ leads with 92.28% vs 72.81% for FAI. On fees, PXQ is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FAI has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FAI or PXQ?

Over the 1-year period, PXQ has performed better with a 92.28% return vs 72.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FAI or PXQ?

PXQ is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FAI or PXQ?

PXQ has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

What is the main difference between FAI and PXQ?

FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while PXQ tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.40% for PXQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PXQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.