PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FAI vs. KNCT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FAI vs. KNCT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FAI achieves a 36.77% return, which is significantly lower than KNCT's 58.43% return.


FAI

1D
-1.66%
1M
17.27%
YTD
36.77%
6M
35.51%
1Y
72.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

KNCT

1D
-3.05%
1M
18.64%
YTD
58.43%
6M
58.28%
1Y
92.28%
3Y*
42.20%
5Y*
20.98%
10Y*
20.97%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FAI vs. KNCT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
36.77%33.37%2.06%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
58.43%28.65%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between FAI and KNCT is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.84

The correlation between FAI and KNCT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FAI vs. KNCT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FAI
FAI Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FAI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FAI Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
FAI Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FAI Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FAI Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

KNCT
KNCT Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
KNCT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KNCT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KNCT Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
KNCT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
KNCT Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FAI vs. KNCT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) and Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FAIKNCTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.70

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.88

9.29

-5.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.65

40.65

-28.00

FAI vs. KNCT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FAI Sharpe Ratio is 2.99, which is lower than the KNCT Sharpe Ratio of 4.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FAI and KNCT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FAIKNCTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.99

4.31

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.70

0.57

+1.13

Drawdowns

FAI vs. KNCT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FAI drawdown since its inception was -27.82%, smaller than the maximum KNCT drawdown of -57.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FAI and KNCT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FAIKNCTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.82%

-57.18%

+29.36%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.84%

-9.99%

-8.85%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-3.67%

+0.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.30%

-10.74%

+5.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.77%

2.28%

+3.49%

Volatility

FAI vs. KNCT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF (FAI) is 8.57%, while Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF (KNCT) has a volatility of 9.83%. This indicates that FAI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KNCT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FAIKNCTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.57%

9.83%

-1.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.40%

17.46%

+1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.47%

21.53%

+2.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.89%

23.22%

+6.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.89%

22.98%

+6.91%

FAI vs. KNCT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FAI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than KNCT's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

FAI vs. KNCT - Dividend Comparison

FAI has not paid dividends to shareholders, while KNCT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
FAI
First Trust Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence ETF
0.00%0.00%0.04%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
KNCT
Invesco Next Gen Connectivity ETF
0.59%0.86%1.38%0.60%2.24%0.55%0.18%0.44%1.22%0.66%0.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


FAI and KNCT have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KNCT has higher volatility (9.83%) compared to FAI (8.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FAI dropped -27.82% vs KNCT's -57.18%.

On 1-year performance, KNCT leads with 92.28% vs 72.81% for FAI. On fees, KNCT is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, FAI has been the lower-risk option at 8.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, KNCT has performed better with a 92.28% return vs 72.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

KNCT is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FAI.

KNCT has the higher dividend yield at 0.59%, compared with 0.00% for FAI.

FAI tracks Bloomberg Artificial Intelligence Index, while KNCT tracks STOXX World AC NexGen Connectivity Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for FAI and 0.40% for KNCT.

KNCT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.31 vs 2.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FAI and KNCT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer